Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identification of research risks and recommendations for development of best practices. (1st June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Klein, Eran; Ojemann, Jeffrey
• Is Part Of: Journal of neural engineering. Volume 13:Number 4(2016:Aug.)
• Publication Date: 2016-06-01
• Subjects: informed consent -- brain–computer interface -- research ethics -- deep brain stimulation -- safety -- neuroethics; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/4/043001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1741-2560

Abstract

Abstract: Objective. Implantable brain–computer interface (BCI) research promises improvements in human health and enhancements in quality of life. Informed consent of subjects is a central tenet of this research. Rapid advances in neuroscience, and the intimate connection between functioning of the brain and conceptions of the self, make informed consent particularly challenging in BCI research. Identification of safety and research-related risks associated with BCI devices is an important step in ensuring meaningful informed consent. Approach. This paper highlights a number of BCI research risks, including safety concerns, cognitive and communicative impairments, inappropriate subject expectations, group vulnerabilities, privacy and security, and disruptions of identity. Main results. Based on identified BCI research risks, best practices are needed for understanding and incorporating BCI-related risks into informed consent protocols. Significance. Development of best practices should be guided by processes that are: multidisciplinary, systematic and transparent, iterative, relational and exploratory.