Back to the future: the nature of regulatory capital requirements. Issue 4 (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chami, R.; Cosimano, T.; Kopp, E.; Rochon, C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of banking regulation. Volume 19:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 327
• Page End: 336
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: Dodd–Frank Act -- Financial CHOICE Act -- Capital adequacy -- Leverage ratio -- Regulatory arbitrage -- G21 -- G28; Banks and banking, International -- Law and legislation -- Periodicals; 346.0821505
• DOI: 10.1057/s41261-018-0061-8
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-6452

Abstract

Abstract This paper compares the current regulatory capital requirements under the Dodd–Frank Act and the 10-% leverage ratio, as proposed by the US Treasury and the US House of Representatives' Financial CHOICE Act (FCA). We find that the majority of US banks would not qualify for an "off-ramp" option—where regulatory relief is offered to qualifying banks organizations (QBOs)—unless considerable amounts of capital are added and that large banks are much closer to the proposed leverage threshold and, therefore, are more likely to stand to gain from regulatory relief. The paper identifies an important moral hazard problem that arises due to the QBO optionality, where banks are likely to increase the riskiness of their asset portfolio and qualify for the FCA "off-ramp" relief with unintended effects on financial stability.