Diagnosis of lethal or prenatal‐onset autosomal recessive disorders by parental exome sequencing. (3rd December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stals, Karen L.; Wakeling, Matthew; Baptista, Júlia; Caswell, Richard; Parrish, Andrew; Rankin, Julia; Tysoe, Carolyn; Jones, Garan; Gunning, Adam C.; Lango Allen, Hana; Bradley, Lisa; Brady, Angela F.; Carley, Helena; Carmichael, Jenny; Castle, Bruce; Cilliers, Deirdre; Cox, Helen; Deshpande, Charu; Dixit, Abhijit; Eason, Jacqueline; Elmslie, Frances; Fry, Andrew E.; Fryer, Alan; Holder, Muriel; Homfray, Tessa; Kivuva, Emma; McKay, Victoria; Newbury‐Ecob, Ruth; Parker, Michael; Savarirayan, Ravi; Searle, Claire; Shannon, Nora; Shears, Deborah; Smithson, Sarah; Thomas, Ellen; Turnpenny, Peter D.; Varghese, Vinod; Vasudevan, Pradeep; Wakeling, Emma; Baple, Emma L.; Ellard, Sian;
• Is Part Of: Prenatal diagnosis. Volume 38:Number 1(2018)
• Page Start: 33
• Page End: 43
• Publication Date: 2017-12-03
• Subjects: Prenatal diagnosis -- Periodicals; Fetus -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.32075
• DOI: 10.1002/pd.5175
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0197-3851

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Rare genetic disorders resulting in prenatal or neonatal death are genetically heterogeneous, but testing is often limited by the availability of fetal DNA, leaving couples without a potential prenatal test for future pregnancies. We describe our novel strategy of exome sequencing parental DNA samples to diagnose recessive monogenic disorders in an audit of the first 50 couples referred. Method: Exome sequencing was carried out in a consecutive series of 50 couples who had 1 or more pregnancies affected with a lethal or prenatal‐onset disorder. In all cases, there was insufficient DNA for exome sequencing of the affected fetus. Heterozygous rare variants (MAF < 0.001) in the same gene in both parents were selected for analysis. Likely, disease‐causing variants were tested in fetal DNA to confirm co‐segregation. Results: Parental exome analysis identified heterozygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in 24 different genes in 26/50 couples (52%). Where 2 or more fetuses were affected, a genetic diagnosis was obtained in 18/29 cases (62%). In most cases, the clinical features were typical of the disorder, but in others, they result from a hypomorphic variant or represent the most severe form of a variable phenotypic spectrum. Conclusion: We conclude that exome sequencing of parental samples is a powerful strategy with high clinical utility for the genetic diagnosis of lethal or prenatal‐onset recessive disorders. © 2017 The Authors Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Abstract : What's already known about this topic? Exome sequencing is used routinely for postnatal diagnosis of rare disorders with a diagnostic yield of 20 to 40%. Insufficient quantity or quality of DNA restricts the use of exome sequencing for diagnosing lethal fetal disorders. Couples are counselled for a likely 25% recurrence risk, but without a genetic diagnosis, no molecular prenatal test is possible. A parental exome sequencing strategy has been applied successfully in a small number of couples. What does this study add? We show that exome sequencing of parental DNA samples is an effective way to diagnose lethal or prenatal‐onset disorders with a diagnostic yield of 52% in an audit of 50 consecutive cases. Testing can be carried out in the prenatal period to guide management of an ongoing pregnancy or for use in subsequent pregnancies to allow couples the option of a prenatal or preimplantation genetic test.