Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photopheresis by using the "off‐line" system: A comparative study between COBE Spectra and Spectra Optia devices. Issue 4 (14th December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photopheresis by using the "off‐line" system: A comparative study between COBE Spectra and Spectra Optia devices. Issue 4 (14th December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photopheresis by using the "off‐line" system: A comparative study between COBE Spectra and Spectra Optia devices
- Authors:
- Pascual, Cristina
González‐Arias, Elena
Pérez‐Corral, Ana María
Bailén, Rebeca
Gayoso, Jorge
Besson, Nelly
Serrano, David
Kwon, Mi
Anguita, Javier
Díez‐Martín, José Luis - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an efficient and established therapy to treat acute and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD). Using an "off‐line " method, the first step (mononuclear cell [MNC] collection) is decisive, as long as a high MNC yield and purity in the collected product is desirable. Two "off‐line " devices were compared: the COBE Spectra and the Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT), using both continuous and intermittent protocols. Patients and methods: Twelve patients with GvHD (7 acute/5 chronic) were enrolled between June 2014 and May 2015 and were alternatively assigned for each procedure to either the COBE Spectra or the Spectra Optia cell separator. Patients characteristics and procedure/product parameters were analyzed. Results: Two hundred procedures (100 per device) were included. The Spectra Optia system showed higher total nucleated cells and MNC collection efficiencies (18.6(10.2‐29.7) vs 7.9(4.1‐14.8)% and 43.6(20.3‐59.5) vs 23.3(11.4‐37.1)%, P < .001) and monocyte and lymphocyte collection efficiencies (55.2(17.7‐83.2) vs 22.8(9‐38.9)% and 38.3(26.7‐53.4) vs 22.2(9‐38.9)%, respectively, P < .001). Absolute platelet loss (PL) and PL per liter of blood processed were significantly lower in the Spectra Optia group (22.9(18.3‐28.1) vs 33.6(26.5‐41.1)%, P < .001 and 3.7(3.1‐4.5) vs 4.3(3.5‐4.2)%, P = .01, respectively). However, granulocyte contamination was higher (4.5(1.3‐36) vs 1.2(0.4‐5.7)%, P < .001) and a higher productAbstract : Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an efficient and established therapy to treat acute and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD). Using an "off‐line " method, the first step (mononuclear cell [MNC] collection) is decisive, as long as a high MNC yield and purity in the collected product is desirable. Two "off‐line " devices were compared: the COBE Spectra and the Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT), using both continuous and intermittent protocols. Patients and methods: Twelve patients with GvHD (7 acute/5 chronic) were enrolled between June 2014 and May 2015 and were alternatively assigned for each procedure to either the COBE Spectra or the Spectra Optia cell separator. Patients characteristics and procedure/product parameters were analyzed. Results: Two hundred procedures (100 per device) were included. The Spectra Optia system showed higher total nucleated cells and MNC collection efficiencies (18.6(10.2‐29.7) vs 7.9(4.1‐14.8)% and 43.6(20.3‐59.5) vs 23.3(11.4‐37.1)%, P < .001) and monocyte and lymphocyte collection efficiencies (55.2(17.7‐83.2) vs 22.8(9‐38.9)% and 38.3(26.7‐53.4) vs 22.2(9‐38.9)%, respectively, P < .001). Absolute platelet loss (PL) and PL per liter of blood processed were significantly lower in the Spectra Optia group (22.9(18.3‐28.1) vs 33.6(26.5‐41.1)%, P < .001 and 3.7(3.1‐4.5) vs 4.3(3.5‐4.2)%, P = .01, respectively). However, granulocyte contamination was higher (4.5(1.3‐36) vs 1.2(0.4‐5.7)%, P < .001) and a higher product haematocrit was obtained with the Spectra Optia (1(0.5‐1.6) vs 0.3(0.2‐0.5)%, P < .001), without an impact on irradiation time. Conclusions: In our study, Spectra Optia proved to be safe and effective in collecting MNC with high yield and purity for ECP in GvHD. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical apheresis. Volume 34:Issue 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical apheresis
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Issue 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0034-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 359
- Page End:
- 366
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12-14
- Subjects:
- cell separator -- extracorporeal photopheresis -- mononuclear cell collection -- graft vs host disease
Hemapheresis -- Periodicals
Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals
Blood -- Transfusion, Autologous -- Periodicals
Cell separation -- Periodicals
Leukapheresis -- Periodicals
Plasmapheresis -- Periodicals
615.39 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-1101 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jca.21679 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0733-2459
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.381500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11043.xml