Can the Atomic Bombings on Japan Be Justified? A Conversation with Dr. Tsuyoshi Hasegawa. Issue 1 (2nd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yamaguchi, Hibiki; Yoshida, Fumihiko; Compel, Radomir
• Is Part Of: Journal for peace and nuclear disarmament. Volume 2:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 19
• Page End: 33
• Publication Date: 2019-01-02
• Subjects: Atomic bomb -- World War II -- Japan's surrender -- Harry Truman -- Joseph Stalin -- war crimes; Nuclear disarmament -- Periodicals; Nuclear disarmament; Periodicals; 327.174705
• DOI: 10.1080/25751654.2019.1625112
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2575-1654

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, a US citizen who was born in Japan, has taught in both countries. Applying his specialized knowledge of Russian history to an analysis of the US decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan, he challenges the prevailing American view that the US decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. The prevailing view is based on two premises: first, the use of the atomic bombs was the only option available to the US government without launching a costly homeland invasion; and second, the atomic bombings had an immediate and direct impact on Japan's decision to surrender. Dr. Hasegawa rebuts both assumptions. He also sets out the third – and often hidden – justification for dropping the bombs, namely, America's sense of revenge. He argues that, even before the atomic bombings, the United States had already crossed the moral high ground that it had held. He views the US use of atomic bombs to be a war crime. But he asserts that this action must be understood in the context of Japan's responsibility for starting the war of aggression and committing atrocities in the Asia–Pacific War.