Removal methods of rigid stylets to minimise adverse force and tracheal tube movement: a mathematical and in‐vitro analysis in manikins1. (15th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kotoda, M.; Oguchi, T.; Mitsui, K.; Hishiyama, S.; Ueda, K.; Kawakami, A.; Matsukawa, T.
• Is Part Of: Anaesthesia. Volume 74:Number 8(2019)
• Page Start: 1041
• Page End: 1046
• Publication Date: 2019-05-15
• Subjects: complications -- intubating stylet -- intubation techniques -- upper airway anatomy; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.96
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.14699
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-2409

Abstract

Summary: This study investigated displacement of the tracheal tube caused by different methods of intubating stylet removal, using in‐vitro experiments and mathematical analysis. In the first in‐vitro experiment, we measured the distance travelled by the tube tip during stylet extraction. Then, we investigated the ideal technique for stylet extraction using mathematical analysis, which would cause minimal tube displacement. Then, using a training manikin, we measured the force applied to the vocal cords and stylet extraction force during tracheal intubation. When the stylet was extracted along a straight path towards the stylet end, the distance travelled by the tube tip significantly increased as the bending angle increased. Mathematical analysis revealed that the stylet should be diagonally extracted (in the sagittal plane) at an appropriate angle, rather than along a straight path towards the direction of the stylet end. In simulated tracheal intubation, extraction force and force applied to the vocal cords both significantly increased as the bending angle increased. Compared with the 'hockey stick'‐shaped stylet, the arcuate‐shaped stylet resulted in reduced force. Our results indicate the potential risk for vocal cord injury when using hockey stick‐shaped stylets with large bending angles.