The efficacy of free‐recall, cognitive load, and closed‐ended questions when children are asked to falsely testify about a crime. Issue 4 (3rd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wyman, Joshua; Foster, Ida; Crossman, Angela; Colwell, Kevin; Talwar, Victoria
• Is Part Of: Applied cognitive psychology. Volume 33:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 544
• Page End: 560
• Publication Date: 2019-01-03
• Subjects: children -- cognitive load -- eyewitness reports -- false reports -- free‐recall; Cognition -- Periodicals; Psychology, Applied -- Periodicals; 153
• DOI: 10.1002/acp.3494
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0888-4080

Abstract

Summary: The current study evaluated the benefits of free‐recall, cognitive load, and closed‐ended questions on children's (ages 6 to 11; N = 147) true and false eyewitness disclosures. Children witnessed an experimenter find a stranger's wallet and were then asked to make a false denial, false accusation, true denial, or true accusation regarding an alleged theft. Overall, the free‐recall question resulted in longer, more forthcoming and more detailed disclosures from older children and those who made a truthful accusation; however, children under the age of 9 and lie‐tellers mostly relied on the closed‐ended questions to discuss the theft. Although the cognitive load questions resulted in newly recalled information, there were no significant narrative differences between true and false statements on these questions. These findings suggest that forensic professionals should consider a child's developmental level, statement veracity, and disclosure‐type (denial vs. accusation) when examining the efficacy of these commonly used questioning strategies.