Comparison of the neurocognitive profiles of individuals with elevated psychotic or depressive symptoms. Issue 4 (3rd July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grossman, Michael; Best, Michael W.; Harrison, Allyson G.; Bowie, Christopher R.
• Is Part Of: Early intervention in psychiatry. Volume 13:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 928
• Page End: 934
• Publication Date: 2018-07-03
• Subjects: clinical high risk -- depression -- early intervention -- neurocognition -- psychosis; Mental health -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Research -- Periodicals; Mental illness -- Prevention -- Research -- Periodicals; Mental illness -- Treatment -- Research -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1111/eip.12713
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-7885

Abstract

Abstract : Aim: Neurocognitive deficits are pervasive and enduring features of severe mental illness that appear before the onset of clinical symptoms and contribute to functional disability. However, it remains unclear how individuals who display warning signs for psychotic or mood disorders compare on their neurocognitive profiles since previous studies have separately examined neurocognition in both groups. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to directly compare performance on a range of neurocognitive tasks in individuals with emerging psychotic or mood symptoms. Methods: Participants were drawn from a database of individuals who completed a comprehensive assessment at a university‐based assessment centre. We examined 3 groups: individuals who endorsed elevated psychotic symptoms (EPS; n = 64), individuals who endorsed elevated depressive symptoms (EDS; n = 58), or non‐clinical comparisons (NCC; n = 57 ) without any elevated psychiatric symptoms or diagnoses. Results: EPS participants performed worse than NCC and EDS groups on verbal comprehension, working memory and cognitive flexibility, and worse than NCC, but not EDS, on perceptual reasoning. There were no significant differences between groups on processing speed, verbal fluency and set‐shifting. EDS performed worse than both EPS and NCC groups on psychomotor speed. Dimensionally, poorer cognitive functioning was more strongly related to EPS than depressive symptoms. Conclusions: These findings highlight the distinct yet overlapping neurocognitive profiles of both groups with emerging psychiatric symptoms, and suggest that, despite having no formal diagnosis, individuals with EPS exhibit observable cognitive impairment and may still benefit from interventions within academic and workplace contexts.