Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. (November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. (November 2018)
- Main Title:
- Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma
- Authors:
- Amaria, Rodabe
Reddy, Sangeetha
Tawbi, Hussein
Davies, Michael
Ross, Merrick
Glitza, Isabella
Cormier, Janice
Lewis, Carol
Hwu, Wen-Jen
Hanna, Ehab
Diab, Adi
Wong, Michael
Royal, Richard
Gross, Neil
Weber, Randal
Lai, Stephen
Ehlers, Richard
Blando, Jorge
Milton, Denái
Woodman, Scott
Kageyama, Robin
Wells, Daniel
Hwu, Patrick
Patel, Sapna
Lucci, Anthony
Hessel, Amy
Lee, Jeffrey
Gershenwald, Jeffrey
Simpson, Lauren
Burton, Elizabeth
Posada, Liberty
Haydu, Lauren
Wang, Linghua
Zhang, Shaojun
Lazar, Alexander
Hudgens, Courtney
Gopalakrishnan, Vancheswaran
Reuben, Alexandre
Andrews, Miles
Spencer, Christine
Prieto, Victor
Sharma, Padmanee
Allison, James
Tetzlaff, Michael
Wargo, Jennifer
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is associated with enhanced survival and antigen-specific T cell responses compared with adjuvant treatment1 ; however, optimal regimens have not been defined. Here we report results from a randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant nivolumab versus combined ipilimumab with nivolumab in 23 patients with high-risk resectable melanoma (NCT02519322 ). RECIST overall response rates (ORR), pathologic complete response rates (pCR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune correlates of response were assessed. Treatment with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab yielded high response rates (RECIST ORR 73%, pCR 45%) but substantial toxicity (73% grade 3 trAEs), whereas treatment with nivolumab monotherapy yielded modest responses (ORR 25%, pCR 25%) and low toxicity (8% grade 3 trAEs). Immune correlates of response were identified, demonstrating higher lymphoid infiltrates in responders to both therapies and a more clonal and diverse T cell infiltrate in responders to nivolumab monotherapy. These results describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma and emphasize the need for additional studies to optimize treatment regimens and to validate putative biomarkers. Neoadjuvant combination treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with high-risk melanoma results in higher response rates than nivolumab monotherapy and warrants future optimization ofAbstract Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is associated with enhanced survival and antigen-specific T cell responses compared with adjuvant treatment1 ; however, optimal regimens have not been defined. Here we report results from a randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant nivolumab versus combined ipilimumab with nivolumab in 23 patients with high-risk resectable melanoma (NCT02519322 ). RECIST overall response rates (ORR), pathologic complete response rates (pCR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune correlates of response were assessed. Treatment with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab yielded high response rates (RECIST ORR 73%, pCR 45%) but substantial toxicity (73% grade 3 trAEs), whereas treatment with nivolumab monotherapy yielded modest responses (ORR 25%, pCR 25%) and low toxicity (8% grade 3 trAEs). Immune correlates of response were identified, demonstrating higher lymphoid infiltrates in responders to both therapies and a more clonal and diverse T cell infiltrate in responders to nivolumab monotherapy. These results describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma and emphasize the need for additional studies to optimize treatment regimens and to validate putative biomarkers. Neoadjuvant combination treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with high-risk melanoma results in higher response rates than nivolumab monotherapy and warrants future optimization of dosing regimens to preserve efficacy while limiting toxicity. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Nature medicine. Volume 24:Number 11(2018)
- Journal:
- Nature medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Number 11(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 11 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0024-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1649
- Page End:
- 1654
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11
- Subjects:
- Pathology, Molecular -- Periodicals
Molecular biology -- Periodicals
610.724 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.nature.com/nm/ ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1078-8956
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6047.030000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10993.xml