The – weak – role of memory in tool use: Evidence from neurodegenerative diseases. (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baumard, Josselin; Lesourd, Mathieu; Remigereau, Chrystelle; Merck, Catherine; Jarry, Christophe; Etcharry-Bouyx, Frédérique; Chauviré, Valérie; Belliard, Serge; Moreaud, Olivier; Osiurak, François; Le Gall, Didier
• Is Part Of: Neuropsychologia. Volume 129(2019)
• Page Start: 117
• Page End: 132
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: Tool use -- Apraxia -- Action knowledge -- Manipulation knowledge -- Alzheimer's disease -- Semantic dementia; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Neuropsychologie -- Périodiques; Neuropsychology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3932

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Although tool use disorders are frequent in neurodegenerative diseases, the question of which cognitive mechanisms are at stake is still under debate. Memory-based hypotheses (i.e., the semantic knowledge hypothesis and the manipulation knowledge hypothesis) posit that tool use relies solely on stored information about either tools or gestures whereas a reasoning-based hypothesis (i.e., the technical-semantic hypothesis) suggests that loss of semantic knowledge can be partially compensated by technical reasoning about the physical properties of tools and objects. Method: These three hypotheses were tested by comparing performance of 30 healthy controls, 30 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 13 patients with semantic dementia in gesture production tasks (i.e., pantomime of tool use, single tool use, real tool use) and tool or gesture recognition tasks (i.e., functional and contextual matching, recognition of tool manipulation). Individual, item-based patterns of performance were analyzed to answer the following question: Could participants demonstrate the use of tools about which they had lost knowledge? With this aim in mind, "validation" and "rebuttal" frequencies were calculated based on each prediction. Results: Predictions from the technical-semantic hypothesis were more frequently observed than memory-based predictions. A number of patients were able to use and demonstrate the use of tools for which they had lost either semantic or manipulation knowledge (or both). Conclusions: These data lead to question the role of different types of memory in tool use. The hypothesis of stored, tool-specific knowledge does not predict accurately clinical performances at the individual level. This may lead to explore the influence of either additional memory systems (e.g., personal/impersonal memory) or other modes of reasoning (e.g., theory of mind) on tool use skills. Highlights: The relative roles of memory and reasoning in tool use skills and disorders are still under debate. This study tested the role of semantic/gestural memory and reasoning in gesture production and gesture recognition tasks. Gesture recognition deficits did not prevent normal gesture production, which is at odds with memory-based hypotheses.