Comparison of alteplase and urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted hemodialysis access. Issue 5 (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of alteplase and urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted hemodialysis access. Issue 5 (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of alteplase and urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted hemodialysis access
- Authors:
- Tan, Ru Yu
Pang, Suh Chien
Teh, Swee Ping
Lee, Kian Guan
Chong, Tze Tec
Gogna, Apoorva
Tan, Chieh Suai - Abstract:
- Background: Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is increasingly used to salvage thrombosed hemodialysis access. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of alteplase compared to urokinase in percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis clotted access. Methods: Records of patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis at Interventional Nephrology Suite in a tertiary teaching hospital from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 were reviewed. Technical and clinical success rates, thrombosis-free and cumulative survivals, procedure time, and radiation dose imparted to patients were compared for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis with urokinase versus alteplase. Results: A total of 122 incident patients underwent pharmacothrombolysis (n = 53 for urokinase, n = 69 for alteplase) during the study period. The mean dose of urokinase and alteplase used was 176, 897 ± 73, 418 units and 3.7 ± 0.8 mg, respectively. Pharmacomechnical thrombolysis using urokinase versus alteplase has similar technical success rate (98.1% vs 97.1%, p = 0.599), clinical success rate (88.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.068), complication rate (9.4% vs 13.0%, p = 0.373), and primary patency rates at 3 months (57.1% vs 70.1%, p = 0.106). Thrombosis-free survivals of the vascular access were 113.2 (35.3, 196) days versus 122 (84, 239) days (p = 0.168). Cumulative survivals were 239 (116, 320) vs 213 (110.5, 316.5) days (p = 0.801). Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, skin dose, and dose were significantly lower forBackground: Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is increasingly used to salvage thrombosed hemodialysis access. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of alteplase compared to urokinase in percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis clotted access. Methods: Records of patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis at Interventional Nephrology Suite in a tertiary teaching hospital from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 were reviewed. Technical and clinical success rates, thrombosis-free and cumulative survivals, procedure time, and radiation dose imparted to patients were compared for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis with urokinase versus alteplase. Results: A total of 122 incident patients underwent pharmacothrombolysis (n = 53 for urokinase, n = 69 for alteplase) during the study period. The mean dose of urokinase and alteplase used was 176, 897 ± 73, 418 units and 3.7 ± 0.8 mg, respectively. Pharmacomechnical thrombolysis using urokinase versus alteplase has similar technical success rate (98.1% vs 97.1%, p = 0.599), clinical success rate (88.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.068), complication rate (9.4% vs 13.0%, p = 0.373), and primary patency rates at 3 months (57.1% vs 70.1%, p = 0.106). Thrombosis-free survivals of the vascular access were 113.2 (35.3, 196) days versus 122 (84, 239) days (p = 0.168). Cumulative survivals were 239 (116, 320) vs 213 (110.5, 316.5) days (p = 0.801). Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, skin dose, and dose were significantly lower for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis using alteplase compared to urokinase (p = 0.045, p < 0.0001, p = 0.006, p = 0.001, respectively). Stenting was found to be associated with successful dialysis following thrombolysis on univariate analysis (odds ratio: 9.167, 95% confidence interval: 1.391–19.846, p = 0.021), although this was no longer significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.078). Conclusion: Alteplase is an effective and safe alternative to urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted vascular access. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of vascular access. Volume 20:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of vascular access
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0020-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 501
- Page End:
- 506
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- Thrombolysis -- arteriovenous fistulas -- hemodialysis -- thrombolytic agents
Arterial catheterization -- Periodicals
Intravenous catheterization -- Periodicals
612.13 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/jva ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1129729818819735 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1129-7298
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10968.xml