From sample to pixel: multi‐scale remote sensing data for upscaling aboveground carbon data in heterogeneous landscapes. Issue 8 (22nd August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leitão, Pedro J.; Schwieder, Marcel; Pötzschner, Florian; Pinto, José R. R.; Teixeira, Ana M. C.; Pedroni, Fernando; Sanchez, Maryland; Rogass, Christian; van der Linden, Sebastian; Bustamante, Mercedes M. C.; Hostert, Patrick
• Is Part Of: Ecosphere. Volume 9:Issue 8(2018)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2018-08-22
• Subjects: aboveground carbon -- Brazilian savanna -- carbon mapping -- Cerrado -- data integration -- ecosystem monitoring -- Hyperion -- hyperspectral -- RapidEye -- upscaling; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2298
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2150-8925

Abstract

Abstract: In times of rapid global change, ecosystem monitoring is of utmost importance. Combined field and remote sensing data enable large‐scale ecosystem assessments, while maintaining local relevance and accuracy. In heterogeneous landscapes, however, the integration of field‐collected data with remote sensing image pixels is not a trivial matter. Indeed, much of the uncertainty in models that use remote sensing to map larger areas lies on the field data integration. In this study, we propose to use fine spatial resolution (5 × 5 m 2 ) remote sensing data as auxiliary data for upscaling field‐sampled aboveground carbon data to target (meso‐scale, i.e., 30 × 30 m 2 ) image pixels. In this process, we assess the effects of field data disaggregation and extrapolation, with and without the auxiliary data. We test this on three study sites in heterogeneous landscapes of the Brazilian savanna. We thus compare two methods that use auxiliary data—surface method, which uses a weighting layer, and regression method, which applies a regression model—with one method without auxiliary data—cartographic method. To evaluate our results, we compared observed vs. estimated aboveground carbon values (for known samples) at the pixel level. Additionally, we fitted a random forest regression model with the assigned carbon estimates and the target satellite imagery and assessed the influence of the fraction of extrapolated vs. sampled carbon values on model performance. We observed that, in heterogeneous landscapes, the use of fine spatial resolution remote sensing data improves the upscaling of field‐based aboveground carbon data to coarser image pixels. We also show that a surface method is more suitable for spatial disaggregation, while a regression approach is preferable for extrapolating non‐sampled pixel fractions. In our study, larger datasets, which included a higher proportion of estimated values, generally delivered better models of aboveground carbon than smaller datasets that are assumed to more reliably reflect reality. Our approach enables to link field and remote sensing data, which in turn enables the detailed mapping of aboveground carbon in heterogeneous landscapes over large areas through the optimized integration of field data and multi‐scale remote sensing data.