Utilisation of Pareto navigation techniques to calibrate a fully automated radiotherapy treatment planning solution. (April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wheeler, Philip A.; Chu, Michael; Holmes, Rosemary; Smyth, Maeve; Maggs, Rhydian; Spezi, Emiliano; Staffurth, John; Lewis, David G.; Millin, Anthony E.
• Is Part Of: Physics and imaging in radiation oncology. Volume 10(2019)
• Page Start: 41
• Page End: 48
• Publication Date: 2019-04
• Subjects: Intensity modulated radiotherapy -- VMAT -- Treatment planning -- Automation -- Pareto navigation -- Prostate cancer -- Multicriteria optimization; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiation dosimetry -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Oncology -- Periodicals; 615.842
• DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.04.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2405-6316

Abstract

Abstract: Background and purpose: Current automated radiotherapy planning solutions do not allow for the intuitive exploration of different treatment options during protocol calibration. This work introduces an automated planning solution, which aims to address this problem through incorporating Pareto navigation techniques into the calibration process. Materials and methods: For each tumour site a set of planning goals is defined. Utilising Pareto navigation techniques an operator calibrates the solution through intuitively exploring different treatment options: selecting the optimum balancing of competing planning goals for the given site. Once calibrated, fully automated plan generation is possible, with specific algorithms implemented to ensure trade-off balancing of new patients is consistent with that during calibration. Using the proposed methodology the system was calibrated for prostate and seminal vesicle treatments. The resultant solution was validated through quantitatively comparing the dose distribution of automatically generated plans (VMATAuto ) against the previous clinical plan, for ten randomly selected patients. Results: VMATAuto yielded statistically significant improvements in: PTV conformity indices, high dose bladder metrics, mean bowel dose, and the majority of rectum dose metrics. Of particular note was the reduction in mean rectum dose (median 25.1 Gy vs. 27.5 Gy), rectum V24.3Gy (median 41.1% vs. 46.4%), and improvement in the conformity index for the primary PTV (median 0.86 vs. 0.79). Dosimetric improvements were not at the cost of other dose metrics. Conclusions: An automated planning methodology with a Pareto navigation based calibration has been developed, which enables the complex balancing of competing trade-offs to be intuitively incorporated into automated protocols.