Structure and quality assurance of Fellowship Training in General Surgery: Consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training. (July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Structure and quality assurance of Fellowship Training in General Surgery: Consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training. (July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Structure and quality assurance of Fellowship Training in General Surgery: Consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training
- Authors:
- Fleming, Christina
Pucher, Philip
Elsey, Elizabeth
Glasbey, James
Conneely, John
Hogan, Aisling
Adair, Robert
Lund, Jonathan
Blencowe, Natalie
Smith, Andrew
Athanasiou, Christos
Wong, Kelvin
Egbuji, Ofuchi
Latif, Aysha
Bibi, Saira
O'Connell, Emer
Flanagan, Michael
Thiyagarajan, Umasankar
Kane, Elizabeth
Baeiv, Yangi
Koshy, Renol
Sudarsanam, Abhilash
Gray, Struvan
Johnstone, Mark
El Muntasar, Ahmed
Adeyanzu, Adetunji
Orizu, Mavis
Mallya, Nisha
Kotecha, Sita
Daliya, Prita
Byrne, Ben E.
Leighton, Pippa
Oliphant, Zoe
Clement, Kieran
Scrimgeour, Duncan
Holroyd, David
Doe, Matthew
Griffiths, Shelly
Chambers, Alice
Tham, Ji
Arunachalam, Priya
O'Callaghan, John
Bellini, Maria Irene
Pereca, Jelizaveta
Hoq, Oram
Sagar, Peter
Begaj, Ardit
Humm, Gemma
Williams, Adam
Thaventhiran, Anthony
Clements, Joshua Michael
Ferguson, Henry
McKay, Siobhan C.
Mohan, Helen
Fleming, Christina
Elsey, Elizabeth
Glasbey, James
Blencowe, Natalie
Mohan, Helen
Elsey, Elizabeth
Glasbey, James
Mohan, Helen
Fleming, Christina
Kane, Elizabeth
Lund, Jonathan
Clements, Joshua
Glasbey, James
Ferguson, Henry
McKay, Siobhan C
Blencowe, Natalie
Peckham-Cooper, Adam
Pucher, Philip
Humm, Gemma
Mohan, Helen
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Over three-quarters of surgical trainees intend to undertake clinical fellowships to improve competence, confidence and the development of super specialised skills. At present there is no standardised national regulation for fellowships in the UK, leading to variability. The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT), an organisation representing surgical trainees in the UK and Ireland, sought to provide recommendations on the structure and quality assurance of fellowships in General Surgery. Methods: A consensus session was held by ASiT at the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) 2017 Congress in Glasgow. A variety of perspectives on fellowships were presented by invited speakers, and thereafter a moderated discussion ensued in order to reach consensus. Live-polling using an electronic application facilitated consensus discussions. A writing group thereafter developed an initial consensus document which was then subject to electronic review by all authors and by ASiT council. Results: Thirty-four delegates attended the consensus session. Views of the delegates and online discussants were that fellowships should be optional and not mandatory. There was (n = 16) no preference expressed between UK and international fellowships by half the group, while half expressed a preference for international fellowships. Regarding UK fellowships, the majority (n = 24) said that national registration of such fellowships should be establishedAbstract: Background: Over three-quarters of surgical trainees intend to undertake clinical fellowships to improve competence, confidence and the development of super specialised skills. At present there is no standardised national regulation for fellowships in the UK, leading to variability. The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT), an organisation representing surgical trainees in the UK and Ireland, sought to provide recommendations on the structure and quality assurance of fellowships in General Surgery. Methods: A consensus session was held by ASiT at the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) 2017 Congress in Glasgow. A variety of perspectives on fellowships were presented by invited speakers, and thereafter a moderated discussion ensued in order to reach consensus. Live-polling using an electronic application facilitated consensus discussions. A writing group thereafter developed an initial consensus document which was then subject to electronic review by all authors and by ASiT council. Results: Thirty-four delegates attended the consensus session. Views of the delegates and online discussants were that fellowships should be optional and not mandatory. There was (n = 16) no preference expressed between UK and international fellowships by half the group, while half expressed a preference for international fellowships. Regarding UK fellowships, the majority (n = 24) said that national registration of such fellowships should be established and (n = 23) agreed that a defined curriculum was required. However, national selection into fellowship training was not supported (n = 20). Perceived advantages of UK fellowships included ease of relocating within the same country (which was considered more family-friendly and cost-effective), and familiarity with the NHS system. Delegates considered the advantages of international fellowships to include: access to high-volume centres; diversity of case-mix; and structured, regulated fellowship programmes. Conclusion: The consensus session found unanimous support for maintaining the option of both UK and international fellowships. While trainees support quality assurance of fellowships, they do not support a national selection process. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of surgery. Volume 67(2019)
- Journal:
- International journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 67(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 67, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0067-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 101
- Page End:
- 106
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07
- Subjects:
- Surgical training -- Fellowship -- Trainee -- 'Live poll' -- Audience response system (ARS)
Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17439191 ↗
http://ees.elsevier.com/ijs/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1743-9191
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.685050
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10922.xml