International Travelers as Sentinels for Sustained Influenza Transmission During the 2009 Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Pandemic. Issue 3 (14th March 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davis, Xiaohong M.; Hay, Kelly A.; Plier, D. Adam; Chaves, Sandra S.; Lim, Poh Lian; Caumes, Eric; Castelli, Francesco; Kozarsky, Phyllis E.; Cetron, Martin S.; Freedman, David O.
• Is Part Of: Journal of travel medicine. Volume 20:Issue 3(2013)
• Page Start: 177
• Page End: 184
• Publication Date: 2013-03-14
• Subjects: Communicable diseases -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Medicine, Preventive -- Periodicals; Travel -- Periodicals; 613.6805
• DOI: 10.1111/jtm.12025
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1195-1982

Abstract

Abstract : Background: International travelers were at risk of acquiring influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (H1N1pdm09) virus infection during travel and importing the virus to their home or other countries. Methods: Characteristics of travelers reported to the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network who carried H1N1pdm09 influenza virus across international borders into a receiving country from April 1, 2009, through October 24, 2009, are described. The relationship between the detection of H1N1pdm09 in travelers and the level of H1N1pdm09 transmission in the exposure country as defined by pandemic intervals was examined using analysis of variance (anova ). Results: Among the 203 (189 confirmed; 14 probable) H1N1pdm09 case‐travelers identified, 56% were male; a majority, 60%, traveled for tourism; and 20% traveled for business. Paralleling age profiles in population‐based studies only 13% of H1N1pdm09 case‐travelers were older than 45 years. H1N1pdm09 case‐travelers sought pre‐travel medical advice less often (8%) than travelers with non‐H1N1pdm09 unspecified respiratory illnesses (24%), and less often than travelers with nonrespiratory illnesses (43%; p < 0.0001). The number of days from first official H1N1pdm09 case reported by a country to WHO and the first GeoSentinel site report of a H1N1pdm09‐exported case in a traveler originated from that country was inversely associated with each country's assigned pandemic interval, or local level of transmission intensity. Conclusion: Detection of travel‐related cases appeared to be a reliable indicator of sustained influenza transmission within the exposure country and may aid planning for targeted surveillance, interventions, and quarantine protocols.