Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial. (August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial. (August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial
- Authors:
- Bonin Pinto, Camila
Morales-Quezada, Leon
de Toledo Piza, Polyana Vulcano
Zeng, Dian
Saleh Vélez, Faddi Ghassan
Ferreira, Isadora Santos
Lucena, Pedro Henrique
Duarte, Dante
Lopes, Fernanda
El-Hagrassy, Mirret M.
Rizzo, Luiz Vicente
Camargo, Erica C.
Lin, David J.
Mazwi, Nicole
Wang, Qing Mei
Black-Schaffer, Randie
Fregni, Felipe - Abstract:
- Background . Although recent evidence has shown a new role of fluoxetine in motor rehabilitation, results are mixed. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with fluoxetine increases upper limb motor function in stroke. Methods . Twenty-seven hemiparetic patients within 2 years of ischemic stroke were randomized into 3 groups: Combined (active rTMS + fluoxetine), Fluoxetine (sham rTMS + fluoxetine), or Placebo (sham rTMS + placebo fluoxetine). Participants received 18 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS in the unaffected primary motor cortex and 90 days of fluoxetine (20 mg/d). Motor function was assessed using Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function (JTHF) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scales. Corticospinal excitability was assessed with TMS. Results . After adjusting for time since stroke, there was significantly greater improvement in JTHF in the combined rTMS + fluoxetine group (mean improvement: −214.33 seconds) than in the placebo (−177.98 seconds, P = 0.005) and fluoxetine (−50.16 seconds, P < 0.001) groups. The fluoxetine group had less improvement than placebo on both scales (respectively, JTHF: −50.16 vs −117.98 seconds, P = 0.038; and FMA: 6.72 vs 15.55 points, P = 0.039), suggesting that fluoxetine possibly had detrimental effects. The unaffected hemisphere showed decreased intracortical inhibition in the combined and fluoxetine groups, and increased intracortical facilitation in the fluoxetine group.Background . Although recent evidence has shown a new role of fluoxetine in motor rehabilitation, results are mixed. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with fluoxetine increases upper limb motor function in stroke. Methods . Twenty-seven hemiparetic patients within 2 years of ischemic stroke were randomized into 3 groups: Combined (active rTMS + fluoxetine), Fluoxetine (sham rTMS + fluoxetine), or Placebo (sham rTMS + placebo fluoxetine). Participants received 18 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS in the unaffected primary motor cortex and 90 days of fluoxetine (20 mg/d). Motor function was assessed using Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function (JTHF) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scales. Corticospinal excitability was assessed with TMS. Results . After adjusting for time since stroke, there was significantly greater improvement in JTHF in the combined rTMS + fluoxetine group (mean improvement: −214.33 seconds) than in the placebo (−177.98 seconds, P = 0.005) and fluoxetine (−50.16 seconds, P < 0.001) groups. The fluoxetine group had less improvement than placebo on both scales (respectively, JTHF: −50.16 vs −117.98 seconds, P = 0.038; and FMA: 6.72 vs 15.55 points, P = 0.039), suggesting that fluoxetine possibly had detrimental effects. The unaffected hemisphere showed decreased intracortical inhibition in the combined and fluoxetine groups, and increased intracortical facilitation in the fluoxetine group. This facilitation was negatively correlated with motor function improvement (FMA, r 2 = −0.398, P = 0.0395). Conclusion . Combined fluoxetine and rTMS treatment leads to better motor function in stroke than fluoxetine alone and placebo. Moreover, fluoxetine leads to smaller improvements than placebo, and fluoxetine's effects on intracortical facilitation suggest a potential diffuse mechanism that may hinder beneficial plasticity on motor recovery. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neurorehabilitation & neural repair. Volume 33:Number 8(2019)
- Journal:
- Neurorehabilitation & neural repair
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Number 8(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 8 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0033-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 643
- Page End:
- 655
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08
- Subjects:
- stroke -- transcranial magnetic stimulation -- fluoxetine -- motor recovery -- recovery of function -- cortical excitability
Nervous system -- Diseases -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
Brain damage -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
Spinal cord -- Wounds and injuries -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Regeneration -- Periodicals
Neuroplasticity -- Periodicals
616.804305 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/nnr ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1545968319860483 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1545-9683
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10915.xml