Assessing Patient Interest in Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations. Issue 1 (May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessing Patient Interest in Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations. Issue 1 (May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Assessing Patient Interest in Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations
- Authors:
- Taksler, Glen B.
Beth Mercer, Mary
Fagerlin, Angela
Rothberg, Michael B. - Abstract:
- Background. Few Americans obtain all 41 guideline-recommended preventive services for nonpregnant adults. We assessed patient interest in prioritizing their preventive care needs.Methods. We conducted a mixed-methods study, with 4 focus groups ( N = 28) at a single institution and a nationwide survey ( N = 2, 103). Participants were middle-aged and older adults with preventive care needs. We obtained reactions to written materials describing the magnitude of benefit from major preventive services, including both absolute and relative benefits. Recommendations were individualized for patient risk factors ("individualized preventive care recommendations"). Focus groups assessed patient interest, how patients would want to discuss individualized recommendations with their providers, and potential for individualized recommendations to influence patient decision making. Survey content was based on focus groups and analyzed with logistic regression.Results. Patients expressed strong interest in individualized recommendations. Among survey respondents, an adjusted 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.7% to 89.7%) found individualized recommendations very easy to understand, 77.2% (95% CI = 75.3% to 79.1%) considered them very useful, and 64.9% (95% CI = 62.8% to 67.0%) highly trustworthy (each ≥6/7 on Likert scale). Three quarters of participants wanted to receive their own individualized recommendations in upcoming primary care visits (adjusted proportion = 77.5%, 95% CI =Background. Few Americans obtain all 41 guideline-recommended preventive services for nonpregnant adults. We assessed patient interest in prioritizing their preventive care needs.Methods. We conducted a mixed-methods study, with 4 focus groups ( N = 28) at a single institution and a nationwide survey ( N = 2, 103). Participants were middle-aged and older adults with preventive care needs. We obtained reactions to written materials describing the magnitude of benefit from major preventive services, including both absolute and relative benefits. Recommendations were individualized for patient risk factors ("individualized preventive care recommendations"). Focus groups assessed patient interest, how patients would want to discuss individualized recommendations with their providers, and potential for individualized recommendations to influence patient decision making. Survey content was based on focus groups and analyzed with logistic regression.Results. Patients expressed strong interest in individualized recommendations. Among survey respondents, an adjusted 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.7% to 89.7%) found individualized recommendations very easy to understand, 77.2% (95% CI = 75.3% to 79.1%) considered them very useful, and 64.9% (95% CI = 62.8% to 67.0%) highly trustworthy (each ≥6/7 on Likert scale). Three quarters of participants wanted to receive their own individualized recommendations in upcoming primary care visits (adjusted proportion = 77.5%, 95% CI = 75.6% to 79.4%). Both focus group and survey participants supported shared decision making and reported that individualized recommendations would improve motivation to obtain preventive care. Half of survey respondents reported that they would be much more likely to visit their doctor if they knew individualized recommendations would be discussed, compared with 4.2% who would not be more likely to visit their doctor. Survey respondents already prioritized preventive services, stating they were most likely to choose quick/easy preventive services and least likely to choose expensive preventive services (adjusted proportions, 63.8% and 8.5%, respectively). Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses.Conclusions. Individualized preventive care recommendations are likely to be well received in primary care and might motivate patients to improve adherence to evidence-based care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- MDM policy & practice. Volume 4:Issue 1(2019)
- Journal:
- MDM policy & practice
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0004-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05
- Subjects:
- Preventive Medicine -- Preventive Health Services -- Decision Making -- Shared
Medicine -- Decision making -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Decision making
Decision Making
Clinical Medicine
Health Policy
Periodicals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.075 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/mpp/ ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2381468319850803 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2381-4683
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10910.xml