Liquid Biopsies to Monitor Solid Organ Transplant Function: A Review of New Biomarkers. Issue 5 (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Verhoeven, Jeroen G. H. P.; Boer, Karin; Van Schaik, Ron H. N.; Manintveld, Olivier C.; Huibers, Manon M. H.; Baan, Carla C.; Hesselink, Dennis A.
• Is Part Of: Therapeutic drug monitoring. Volume 40:Issue 5(2018:Oct.)
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: allograft -- biomarkers -- cfDNA -- nucleosomes -- extracellular vesicles -- transplantation -- rejection; Pharmacokinetics -- Periodicals; Patient monitoring -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Analysis -- Periodicals; Body fluids -- Analysis -- Periodicals; Drug Therapy -- Periodicals; Monitoring, Physiologic -- Periodicals; Pharmacology -- Periodicals; 615.7
• DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000549
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0163-4356

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Despite modern immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection remains a major cause of solid organ transplant dysfunction. For clinical care, organ transplant function is routinely monitored by measuring biomarkers that, depending on the organ transplanted, include serum creatinine, N-terminal pro-hormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and aspartate aminotransferase. All can be measured easily in clinical chemistry laboratories. The main problem with these biomarkers is that they have a low sensitivity for the detection of allograft damage and are nonspecific for the detection of allograft rejection. To diagnose rejection, histologic examination of grafted tissue is necessary, which requires an invasive biopsy procedure. There is thus an unmet need in transplantation medicine for biomarkers that are specific for rejection, identify graft injury at an early stage, and may eventually overcome the need for a transplant biopsy. Recently, tremendous progress in the field of biomarkers has been made. In this narrative review, the potential of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA), cell-free nucleosomes, and extracellular vesicles to act as next-generation biomarkers for solid organ transplant is discussed. Based on the fact that cell content is released during rejection, these markers could serve as very specific biomarkers for allograft injury and rejection. These markers have the potential to improve rejection monitoring, evaluate the response to antirejection therapy, and may decrease the need for invasive procedures.