Reproducibility of 2 Liver 2‐Dimensional Shear Wave Elastographic Techniques in the Fasting and Postprandial States. (11th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Simkin, Paul; Rattansingh, Anand; Liu, Kuan; Hudson, John M.; Atri, Mostafa; Jang, Hyun‐Jung; Kim, Tae Kyoung; Khalili, Korosh
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 38:Number 7(2019)
• Page Start: 1739
• Page End: 1745
• Publication Date: 2018-12-11
• Subjects: liver -- postprandial -- reliability -- reproducibility -- shear wave elastography; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.14862
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and agreement of 2 methods of 2‐dimensional (2D) shear wave elastography (SWE) on liver stiffness in healthy volunteers. We also assessed effects of the prandial state and operator experience on measurements. Methods: Two operators, 1 experienced and 1 novice, independently examined 20 healthy volunteers with 2D SWE on 2 ultrasound machines (Aixplorer [SuperSonic Imagine, Aix‐en‐Provence, France] and Aplio 500 [Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan]). Volunteers were scanned 8 times by the operators using both machines in fasting and postprandial states. Agreement was evaluated by a Bland‐Altman analysis, and the correlation was assessed by the Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). An analysis of variance was conducted to determine the contribution of the machine, prandial state, and operator experience to the variability. Results: Agreement assessed by Bland‐Altman plots showed no statistically significant difference in measured liver stiffness between the machines (mean difference, –0.8%; 95% confidence interval, –3.7%, 2.1%), with a critical difference of 1.36 kPa. The correlation was good to excellent for both the crude overall Pearson coefficient and the ICC, both measuring 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.82, 0.92). Subclass ICCs for the fasting state, postprandial state, novice operator, and experienced operator were 0.89, 0.88, 0.90, and 0.86, respectively. The 2‐way mixed effect analysis of variance showed that the volunteers accounted for 86.3% of variation in median liver stiffness, with no statistically significant contribution from operator experience, the prandial state, or the machine ( P = .108, .067, and .296, respectively). Conclusions: Our study showed that the 2D SWE techniques had a high degree of reliability and agreement in measurement of liver stiffness in a healthy population. Operator experience and the prandial state did not impart significant variability to stiffness measurements.