Computer-aided design and three-dimensional printing improves symmetry in heminasal reconstruction outcomes. Issue 7 (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yen, Cheng-I; Zelken, Jonathan A.; Chang, Chun-Shin; Lo, Lun-Jou; Yang, Jui-Yung; Chuang, Shiow-Shuh; Araniego, Cheryl A.; Hsiao, Yen-Chang
• Is Part Of: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 72:Issue 7(2019)
• Page Start: 1198
• Page End: 1206
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: Computer-aided design -- Computer-aided manufacturing -- Three-dimensional printing -- Mirroring -- Nasal reconstruction; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 617.9505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-6815

Abstract

Summary: Background: Symmetry and balance in nasal reconstruction can be hard to achieve. Traditionally, a foil template modeled after the unaffected contralateral side is used in the design of a forehead flap. Crude two-dimensional models often generate underwhelming results. To better simulate complex nasal topography, three-dimensional printing technology was applied to nasal reconstruction. Methods: Between May 2012 and October 2016, twenty patients underwent forehead flap nasal reconstruction for heminasal deformities. Ten reconstructions were guided with prefabricated three-dimensional templates (CAD/CAM), and ten patients underwent traditional nasal reconstruction without CAD/CAM. In the CAD/CAM group, two templates were printed: contour guide and framework guide. These were a reference for skin flap design and cartilage framework design, respectively. Photographic records and photogrammetry was used to evaluate results. Results: The mean follow-up time was 19.3 months (range, 6 months to 38 months) in the control group and 17.4 months (range, 7 months to 35 months) in the CAD/CAM group. Without CAD/CAM, there was asymmetry in alar width, alar area, nostril height, width and area ( p < 0.05) between reconstructed and native structures. In the CAD/CAM group, there were asymmetries of nostril-related parameters only. After quantifying asymmetries as a percentage, the CAD/CAM group demonstrated more symmetric reconstructions, particularly in alar width ( p = 0.043) and alar area ( p = 0.003). Conclusions: When CAD/CAM guidance and three-dimensional printing was used, there was greater symmetry between reconstructed and native structures of the nose.