Large fetal weight alone in Robson-1 parturients doesn't translate into a risk of Caesarean delivery higher then that of a vaginal birth. (August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Large fetal weight alone in Robson-1 parturients doesn't translate into a risk of Caesarean delivery higher then that of a vaginal birth. (August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Large fetal weight alone in Robson-1 parturients doesn't translate into a risk of Caesarean delivery higher then that of a vaginal birth
- Authors:
- Póka, Robert
Barna, Levente
Damjanovich, Péter
Farkas, Zsolt
Molnár, Szabolcs
Orosz, Mónika
Ördög, Lilla
Sipos, Attila
Juhász, Gábor
Török, Olga - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: The authors analysed the Caesarean section rate as a function of birth weight among Robson-1 parturients and compared with that among the unselected obstetric population. Study design: A retrospective analysis of birth weight, maternal height and the route of delivery was carried out in an unselected obstetric population of 26, 012 parturients. The authors compared birth weight centile distributions of vaginally, and that of abdominally delivered fetuses between Robson-1 parturients as well as those of the total obstetric population. Results: The 90th birth weight centile of fetuses delivered at 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks gestation were 3960 g, 3960 g, 4000 g, 3950 g, 4000 g and 3820 g, respectively. Among Robson-1 parturients, 677 fetuses weighed >4000 g, and 448 patients (66%) were delivered vaginally. Maternal height did not influence either the birth-weight-percentiles or the Caesarean-rates substantially. Above the birth weight of 4000 g, the Caesarean-rate among Robson-1 parturient rose similarly to that of the total obstetric population. In the knowledge of the most accurately estimated fetal weight, the odds of Caesarean delivery among Robson-1 parturients was not different from that of the total obstetric population. Among pregnancies with fetuses weighing less than 5000 g, the Caesarean-rate was below 50% in both Robson-1 parturients and the total obstetric population of 10 years. Conclusion: Even the best possible estimation of fetalAbstract: Objective: The authors analysed the Caesarean section rate as a function of birth weight among Robson-1 parturients and compared with that among the unselected obstetric population. Study design: A retrospective analysis of birth weight, maternal height and the route of delivery was carried out in an unselected obstetric population of 26, 012 parturients. The authors compared birth weight centile distributions of vaginally, and that of abdominally delivered fetuses between Robson-1 parturients as well as those of the total obstetric population. Results: The 90th birth weight centile of fetuses delivered at 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks gestation were 3960 g, 3960 g, 4000 g, 3950 g, 4000 g and 3820 g, respectively. Among Robson-1 parturients, 677 fetuses weighed >4000 g, and 448 patients (66%) were delivered vaginally. Maternal height did not influence either the birth-weight-percentiles or the Caesarean-rates substantially. Above the birth weight of 4000 g, the Caesarean-rate among Robson-1 parturient rose similarly to that of the total obstetric population. In the knowledge of the most accurately estimated fetal weight, the odds of Caesarean delivery among Robson-1 parturients was not different from that of the total obstetric population. Among pregnancies with fetuses weighing less than 5000 g, the Caesarean-rate was below 50% in both Robson-1 parturients and the total obstetric population of 10 years. Conclusion: Even the best possible estimation of fetal weight cannot give a valid reason to downplay the intent of vaginal birth based on the fetal size above 3900 g that would be associated with increased odds of Caesarean delivery. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 239(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
- Issue:
- Volume 239(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 239, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 239
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0239-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 7
- Page End:
- 10
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08
- Subjects:
- Birthweight -- Caesarean section -- Large fetus
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
Obstétrique -- Périodiques
Gynécologie -- Périodiques
Reproduction -- Périodiques
Verloskunde
Gynaecologie
Voortplanting (biologie)
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Reproduction
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03012115 ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00282243 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.025 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-2115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10859.xml