Effects of Laparoscopic Hernia Repair by PIRS (Percutan Internal Ring Suturing) Technique on Testicular Artery Blood Supply. Issue 4 (19th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Oral, Akgun; Karaca, Leyla; Ahiskalioglu, Ali; Yildiz, Abdullah; Yigiter, Murat; Celikkaya, Mehmet Emin; Chyndolotov, Temirlan; Salman, Ahmet Bedii
• Is Part Of: Journal of investigative surgery. Volume 32:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 343
• Page End: 347
• Publication Date: 2019-05-19
• Subjects: percutaneous internal ring suturing -- laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair children -- open inguinal hernia repair -- testicular blood flow -- resistive index -- minimally invasive surgery; Surgery -- Research -- Periodicals; Research; Surgery; Surgical Procedures, Operative; 617.075
• DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1419317
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0894-1939

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose : Percutaneous internal ring suturing technique (PIRS) is a minimally invasive technique in pediatric inguinal hernia repair. In the present study, a negative effect on testicular blood flow using PIRS technique has been investigated. Methods : Forty male patients were included in the study prospectively. Two groups were formed as conventional open surgery (Group I) and PIRS technique (Group II). The resistive index (RI) value of the testicular artery was measured prospectively by using SMI (superb micro-vascular imaging) software with the color doppler ultrasound technique preoperatively and postoperatively at the first month. Results : Inguinal hernia was present on the left in 35% ( n = 14) of the patients and on the right in 65% ( n = 26) of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.727) between Group I and II with regard to preoperative RI value (0.66 ± 0.07 vs. 0.66 ± 0.45, respectively). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.220) between Group I and II with regard to the RI values measured at the postoperative first month (0.58 ± 0.04 vs. 0.60 ± 0.04, respectively). Although the postoperative RI values decreased compared to the preoperative values in both groups, this difference was not statistically significant. ( p = 0.447 in Group I, and p = 0.175 in Group II for intragroup comparison). Conclusions : Besides PIRS technique has the advantages provided by all other laparoscopic techniques defined for inguinal hernia repair, there is no significant difference between this technique and conventional open surgery with regard to testicular blood flow. It is an innovative candidate technique instead of the open surgery method besides its additional advantages.