Does prior coronary angioplasty affect outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization? Insights from the STICH trial. (15th September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Does prior coronary angioplasty affect outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization? Insights from the STICH trial. (15th September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Does prior coronary angioplasty affect outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization? Insights from the STICH trial
- Authors:
- Nicolau, Jose C.
Stevens, Susanna R.
Al-Khalidi, Hussein R.
Jatene, Fabio B.
Furtado, Remo H.M.
Dallan, Luis A.O.
Lisboa, Luiz A.F.
Desvigne-Nickens, Patrice
Haddad, Haissam
Jolicoeur, E. Marc
Petrie, Mark C.
Doenst, Torsten
Michler, Robert E.
Ohman, E. Magnus
Maddury, Jyotsna
Ali, Imtiaz
Deja, Marek A.
Rouleau, Jean L.
Velazquez, Eric J.
Hill, James A. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The STICH trial showed superiority of coronary artery bypass plus medical treatment (CABG) over medical treatment alone (MED) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. In previous publications, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to CABG was associated with worse prognosis. Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to analyse if prior PCI influenced outcomes in STICH. Methods and results: Patients in the STICH trial (n = 1212), followed for a median time of 9.8 years, were included in the present analyses. In the total population, 156 had a prior PCI (74 and 82, respectively, in the MED and CABG groups). In those with vs. without prior PCI, the adjusted hazard-ratios (aHRs) were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.74–1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.64–1.11) for CV mortality, and 1.43 (95% CI = 1.15–1.77) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG without prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70–0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (95% CI = 0.62–0.90) for CV mortality and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56–0.80) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG with prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.50–1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.49–1.36) for CV mortality and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.41–0.90) for CV hospitalization. There was no evidence of interaction between randomized treatment and prior PCI for any endpoint (all adjusted p > 0.05). Conclusion: In the STICH trial, prior PCI did not affectAbstract: Background: The STICH trial showed superiority of coronary artery bypass plus medical treatment (CABG) over medical treatment alone (MED) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. In previous publications, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to CABG was associated with worse prognosis. Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to analyse if prior PCI influenced outcomes in STICH. Methods and results: Patients in the STICH trial (n = 1212), followed for a median time of 9.8 years, were included in the present analyses. In the total population, 156 had a prior PCI (74 and 82, respectively, in the MED and CABG groups). In those with vs. without prior PCI, the adjusted hazard-ratios (aHRs) were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.74–1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.64–1.11) for CV mortality, and 1.43 (95% CI = 1.15–1.77) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG without prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70–0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (95% CI = 0.62–0.90) for CV mortality and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56–0.80) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG with prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.50–1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.49–1.36) for CV mortality and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.41–0.90) for CV hospitalization. There was no evidence of interaction between randomized treatment and prior PCI for any endpoint (all adjusted p > 0.05). Conclusion: In the STICH trial, prior PCI did not affect the outcomes of patients whether they were treated medically or surgically, and the superiority of CABG over MED remained unchanged regardless of prior PCI. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ; Identifier:NCT00023595 Highlights: Prior reports suggested an association of prior PCI with worse outcomes after CABG. Patients with severe LV dysfunction were under-represented in those studies. STICH trial demonstrated survival benefit with CABG in severe LV dysfunction. This benefit was consistent regardless of the presence of prior PCI. Prior PCI should not contra-indicate CABG in patients with LV dysfunction. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of cardiology. Volume 291(2019)
- Journal:
- International journal of cardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 291(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 291, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 291
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0291-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 36
- Page End:
- 41
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09-15
- Subjects:
- Coronary artery bypass surgery -- Heart failure -- Left ventricular dysfunction -- Percutaneous coronary intervention
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.12 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01675273 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01675273 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.03.029 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-5273
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.158000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10844.xml