Pursuing Civilian Control Over the Military. Issue 3 (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Travis, Donald S.
• Is Part Of: Armed forces and society. Volume 45:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 546
• Page End: 560
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: coups and conflicts -- democracy -- militarism -- military effectiveness -- military organization -- public policy -- civil–military relations; Sociology, Military -- Periodicals; Sociology, Military -- United States -- Periodicals; Armed Forces -- Periodicals; United States -- Armed Forces -- Periodicals; 306.27
• DOI: 10.1177/0095327X18781539
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0095-327X

Abstract

This essay is responding to Dr. Ionut Popescu's review of the article "Saving Samuel Huntington and the Need for Pragmatic Civil-Military Relations." He challenges the pragmatist outlook by questioning its usefulness to "manage relations between the military and its civilian superiors in a democracy such as the United States." Based on the concerns of Morris Janowitz regarding military relations, three assertions are made in defense of the pragmatic approach. First, the choice between "professional versus civilian supremacy" for making crucial decisions during wartime is misleading because it is based on obsolete thinking from the twentieth-century Cold War. Second, types of wars waged are determined by complex and provisional decision-making processes amid political struggle. Third, Huntington's civil–military theory wrongly maligns the word "politics" by distorting its meaning and purpose. Politics is a natural process and an essential feature of democracy.