Management of anticoagulation for cancer‐associated thrombosis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A systematic review. Issue 4 (19th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Samuelson Bannow, Bethany R.; Lee, Agnes Y. Y.; Khorana, Alok A.; Zwicker, Jeffrey I.; Noble, Simon; Ay, Cihan; Carrier, Marc
• Is Part Of: Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis. Volume 2:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 664
• Page End: 669
• Publication Date: 2018-06-19
• Subjects: hemorrhage -- neoplams -- thrombocytopenia -- venous thromboembolism -- venous thrombosis; Thrombosis -- Periodicals; Hemostasis -- Periodicals; 616.135005
• DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12111
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2475-0379

Abstract

Abstract: Essentials The management of anticoagulation in patients with thrombocytopenia is controversial. Some studies suggest to administer reduced‐dose low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH). While other studies suggest full‐dose anticoagulation using LMWH and transfusion support. The results from our systematic review do not support one management strategy over another. Background: The management of anticoagulation for cancer‐associated thrombosis (CAT) in patients with thrombocytopenia is controversial. Whereas some studies suggest that administration of reduced‐dose low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) or temporary discontinuation for moderate and severe thrombocytopenia may be a safe and effective, others suggest full‐dose anticoagulation with transfusion support. We sought to address this important knowledge gap and summarize the literature comparing these two common management strategies. Methods: A systematic review of the literature (PROSPERO CRD42017077127) using MEDLINE (inception to September 2017) was conducted. We included studies that reported recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding complications among patients treated with both of the two most common management strategies: therapeutic anticoagulation with platelet transfusion support and dose‐modified anticoagulation for periods when the platelet count is <50 × 10 9 /L. Results: A total of 134 article records were identified on the initial search and 10 articles underwent full text review. Two observational studies met the inclusions criteria. A total of 121 patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia were included. Forty‐two of these patients had pulmonary embolism and 87 had deep vein thrombosis (DVT) including 38 upper extremity DVT. Overall, 27% of patients, regardless of their treatment strategy, experienced recurrent VTE. Thirteen percent of anticoagulated patients (15% of all patients) experienced a major bleeding episode. Meta‐analysis could not be conducted. Conclusions: Our findings do not support one management strategy over another to treat CAT patients with thrombocytopenia. However, the data highlights the heightened risk of recurrent VTE in this patient population despite the thrombocytopenia.