Assessing the cumulative impacts of geographically isolated wetlands on watershed hydrology using the SWAT model coupled with improved wetland modules. (1st October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, S.; Yeo, I.-Y.; Lang, M.W.; Sadeghi, A.M.; McCarty, G.W.; Moglen, G.E.; Evenson, G.R.
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 223(2018)
• Page Start: 37
• Page End: 48
• Publication Date: 2018-10-01
• Subjects: Soil water assessment tool (SWAT) -- Improved wetland modules -- Riparian wetlands (RWs) -- Geographically isolated wetlands (GIWs) -- Wetland loss -- Downstream flow; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: Despite recognizing the importance of wetlands in the Coastal Plain of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed (CBW) in terms of ecosystem services, our understanding of wetland functions has mostly been limited to individual wetlands and overall catchment-scale wetland functions have rarely been investigated. This study is aimed at assessing the cumulative impacts of wetlands on watershed hydrology for an agricultural watershed within the Coastal Plain of the CBW using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). We employed two improved wetland modules for enhanced representation of physical processes and spatial distribution of riparian wetlands (RWs) and geographically isolated wetlands (GIWs). This study focused on GIWs as their hydrological impacts on watershed hydrology are poorly understood and GIWs are poorly protected. Multiple wetland scenarios were prepared by removing all or portions of the baseline GIW condition indicated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory geospatial dataset. We further compared the impacts of GIWs and RWs on downstream flow (i.e., streamflow at the watershed outlet). Our simulation results showed that GIWs strongly influenced downstream flow by altering water transport mechanisms in upstream areas. Loss of all GIWs reduced both water routed to GIWs and water infiltrated into the soil through the bottom of GIWs, leading to an increase in surface runoff of 9% and a decrease in groundwater flow of 7% in upstream areas. These changes resulted in increased variability of downstream flow in response to extreme flow conditions. GIW loss also induced an increase in month to month variability of downstream flow and a decrease in the baseflow contribution to streamflow. Loss of all GIWs was shown to cause a greater fluctuation of downstream flow than loss of all RWs for this study site, due to a greater total water storage capacity of GIWs. Our findings indicate that GIWs play a significant role in controlling hydrological processes in upstream areas and downstream flow and, therefore, protecting GIWs is important for enhanced hydrological resilience to extreme flow conditions in this region. Highlights: Impacts of geographically isolated wetland (GIW) losses were assessed. GIW losses caused changes in water transport mechanisms in upstream areas. GIW losses caused an increase in variability of downstream flow. Protecting GIWs is important for enhanced hydrological resilience.