Low temperature degradation of single layers of multilayered zirconia in comparison to conventional unshaded zirconia: Phase transformation and flexural strength. (January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wille, Sebastian; Zumstrull, Paul; Kaidas, Victor; Jessen, Lea Katharina; Kern, Matthias
• Is Part Of: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. Volume 77(2018)
• Page Start: 171
• Page End: 175
• Publication Date: 2018-01
• Subjects: zirconia -- Biaxial flexural strength -- Phase transformation -- Shading particles; Biomedical materials -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-6161

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the transformation of yttrium stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) to monoclinic phase and its change in flexural strength of the various layers of multilayered zirconia (enamel layer, transition layer 1, transition layer 2 and body layer) in comparison to two conventional zirconia ceramics. Additionally, the ball-on-three-balls test was compared with a conventional biaxial flexural strength test. Methods: The crystallographic structure of the four layers of Katana Zirconia ML (Kuraray), e.max ZirCAD (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Lava Plus (3M ESPE) was investigated by x-ray-diffraction before and after hydrothermal aging in an autoclave for 5, 10, 15 and 20 h. The biaxial flexural strength was examined with a piston-on-three-ball test and a ball-on-three-balls test. Results: There was a significant difference of the ratio of transformation with respect to the tested materials, also between the four different layers of multilayered zirconia. After 20 h of hydrothermal aging the mean ratio of monoclinic phase ranged from 9.9 vol% (LAVA Plus) to 44.2 vol% (Katana Zirconia ML, enamel layer). However, hydrothermal aging had no significant influence on the flexural strength of any material. Furthermore, the flexural strength measured by the ball-on-three-balls test was higher than that measured by the piston-on-three-ball test. Conclusion: A ratio of 40% monoclinic phase at the surface did not significantly influence the biaxial flexural strength. Both test methods provide reliable results. However, as the ball-on-three balls test is less dependent on surface roughness, it might be preferred for investigations adapted to clinical reality.