Endoscopic criteria to evaluate tumor response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using magnifying chromoendoscopy. Issue 8 (August 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Endoscopic criteria to evaluate tumor response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using magnifying chromoendoscopy. Issue 8 (August 2018)
- Main Title:
- Endoscopic criteria to evaluate tumor response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using magnifying chromoendoscopy
- Authors:
- Chino, Akiko
Konishi, Tsuyoshi
Ogura, Atsushi
Kawachi, Hiroshi
Osumi, Hiroki
Yoshio, Toshiyuki
Kishihara, Teruhito
Ide, Daisuke
Saito, Shoichi
Igarashi, Masahiro
Akiyoshi, Takashi
Ueno, Masashi
Fujisaki, Junko - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background and aims: Precise endoscopic assessment of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgery is important for optimizing surgical and non-surgical treatment. We prospectively evaluated the accuracy of the newly proposed endoscopic criteria to identify complete response, using magnifying chromoendoscopy. Methods: New endoscopic criteria were created to define endoscopic complete response, near complete response and incomplete response, using magnifying chromoendoscopy. The criteria contained notable endoscopic findings, including shape of the scar, state of the ulcer, finding of white moss, presence of residual protruded nodules, regenerated pits of the scar, presence of neoplastic pit patterns, and extension of rectal wall. Seventy-nine patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were prospectively evaluated 1–3 days before resection. Diagnostic accuracy to identify pathological complete response and interobserver agreement among a supervising colonoscopist and two trainees were investigated. Results: Pathological complete response was obtained in 17 patients (21.5%). The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic complete response was 85%, with a sensitivity of 47%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 80% and negative predictive value of 77%. The kappa-value for interobserver agreement across 3 doctors was 0.57 (standard error, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.76). Conclusion: The newly proposedAbstract: Background and aims: Precise endoscopic assessment of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgery is important for optimizing surgical and non-surgical treatment. We prospectively evaluated the accuracy of the newly proposed endoscopic criteria to identify complete response, using magnifying chromoendoscopy. Methods: New endoscopic criteria were created to define endoscopic complete response, near complete response and incomplete response, using magnifying chromoendoscopy. The criteria contained notable endoscopic findings, including shape of the scar, state of the ulcer, finding of white moss, presence of residual protruded nodules, regenerated pits of the scar, presence of neoplastic pit patterns, and extension of rectal wall. Seventy-nine patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were prospectively evaluated 1–3 days before resection. Diagnostic accuracy to identify pathological complete response and interobserver agreement among a supervising colonoscopist and two trainees were investigated. Results: Pathological complete response was obtained in 17 patients (21.5%). The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic complete response was 85%, with a sensitivity of 47%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 80% and negative predictive value of 77%. The kappa-value for interobserver agreement across 3 doctors was 0.57 (standard error, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.76). Conclusion: The newly proposed endoscopic criteria using magnifying chromoendoscopy achieved excellent diagnostic accuracy to determine good responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer, with fair interobserver agreement. The criteria could be clinically useful to select patients for non-surgical management. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 44:Issue 8(2018)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 44:Issue 8(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 8 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0044-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1247
- Page End:
- 1253
- Publication Date:
- 2018-08
- Subjects:
- Endoscopic evaluation criteria for chemoradiotherapy -- Watch and wait -- Chemoradiotherapy -- Rectal cancer -- Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors -- Endoscopic findings of complete response
Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.013 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10770.xml