Approximation of wave action flux velocity in strongly sheared mean flows. (August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Banihashemi, Saeideh; Kirby, James T.; Dong, Zhifei
• Is Part Of: Ocean modelling. Volume 116(2017:Aug.)
• Page Start: 33
• Page End: 47
• Publication Date: 2017-08
• Subjects: Wave-current interaction -- Wave action flux -- Ocean models -- Waves over sheared currents; Oceanography -- Periodicals; Océanographie -- Périodiques; Oceanography; Periodicals; 551.46
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1463-5003

Abstract

Highlights: Most spectral wave models use a depth uniform current to evaluate current effects on waves. Several recent studies have made use of a depth-weighted current. This study demonstrates the inapproprietness of the use of the weighted current. A method for extending the range of model accuracy is proposed. Abstract: Spectral wave models based on the wave action equation typically use a theoretical framework based on depth uniform current to account for current effects on waves. In the real world, however, currents often have variations over depth. Several recent studies have made use of a depth-weighted current U ˜ due to [Skop, R. A., 1987. Approximate dispersion relation for wave-current interactions. J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Eng. 113, 187–195.] or [Kirby, J. T., Chen, T., 1989. Surface waves on vertically sheared flows: approximate dispersion relations. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 1013–1027.] in order to account for the effect of vertical current shear. Use of the depth-weighted velocity, which is a function of wavenumber (or frequency and direction) has been further simplified in recent applications by only utilizing a weighted current based on the spectral peak wavenumber. These applications do not typically take into account the dependence of U ˜ on wave number k, as well as erroneously identifying U ˜ as the proper choice for current velocity in the wave action equation. Here, we derive a corrected expression for the current component of the group velocity. We demonstrate its consistency using analytic results for a current with constant vorticity, and numerical results for a measured, strongly-sheared current profile obtained in the Columbia River. The effect of choosing a single value for current velocity based on the peak wave frequency is examined, and we suggest an alternate strategy, involving a Taylor series expansion about the peak frequency, which should significantly extend the range of accuracy of current estimates available to the wave model with minimal additional programming and data transfer.