Soil properties and neighbouring forest cover affect above‐ground biomass and functional composition during tropical forest restoration. Issue 2 (8th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Toledo, Renato Miazaki; Santos, Rozely Ferreira; Baeten, Lander; Perring, Michael P.; Verheyen, Kris
• Editors: Ward, David
• Is Part Of: Applied vegetation science. Volume 21:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 179
• Page End: 189
• Publication Date: 2018-02-08
• Subjects: Atlantic rain forest -- dispersal -- disturbance -- environmental filters -- landscape ecology -- recovery -- traits; Plant ecology -- Periodicals; Plant communities -- Periodicals; Plant populations -- Periodicals; Nature -- Effect of human beings on -- Periodicals; 581.705
• DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12363
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1402-2001

Abstract

Abstract: Questions: We studied the importance of soil properties and neighbouring forest cover in affecting plant community biomass and assembly during the tropical forest restoration process. We also investigated how compositional responses depended on traits expected to influence individual success. Location: Forest restoration sites across anthropogenic grasslands in mixed use agricultural watersheds, eastern São Paulo state, Brazil. Methods: We identified and measured all woody individuals (DBH ≥ 5 cm) in four 200‐m² plots per site. Then we translated these measurements into above‐ground biomass (AGB), and related AGB variability to neighbouring forest cover, soil texture and chemical fertility using mixed effect models. We assessed the effect of these predictors on different species groups, arranged according to variation in wood density, tree height or habitat selectivity, through multivariate abundance models. Results: AGB ranged between 0 and 104.7 t/ha (median of 10.4 t/ha), with high variation within, as well as between, watersheds. Sand percentage, forest cover and the interaction between soil nutrient concentrations and sand percentage were good predictors of measured AGB. The most parsimonious model projected a seven growing seasons AGB recovery of 70.90 t/ha, when a site is on fertile soils with 10% sand and surrounded by forest cover of 50%. In contrast, only 5.24 t/ha is predicted on acidic‐poor soils with 67% sand and 0% forest cover. Increasing forest cover favoured smaller trees and habitat generalists while increasing sand percentage inhibited taller species and forest specialists. Sand percentage constrained softwoods in fertile soils. Conclusion: Our results confirm that the likelihood of restoration to pre‐disturbance conditions is constrained in contexts of higher degradation, such as when agricultural use adversely affects soil properties and/or motivates extreme deforestation. Lower AGB found on sandy soils suggests that forest recovery is sensitive to local drought intensification. Given regional projections for extended dry seasons, restoration approaches could consider targeting alternative reference states, rather than historical/undisturbed ones, under highly altered environments, while aiming to improve soil and microclimate conditions to allow moist tropical forest recovery where feasible. Abstract : We compared 32 tropical forest restoration sites in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. We observed that similar restoration practices resulted in contrasting forest recoveries. Neighbouring forest cover and soil properties shaped aboveground biomass, and influenced composition through selection of species with certain functional traits. Importantly, results imply that local drought intensification will critically obstruct classical tropical forest restoration in agricultural landscapes.