Survival and Quality of Life Impact of a Risk-based Allocation Algorithm for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation. Issue 9 (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Calisa, Vaishnavi; Craig, Jonathan C.; Howard, Kirsten; Howell, Martin; Alexander, Stephen; Chadban, Steven J.; Clayton, Philip; Lim, Wai H.; Kanellis, John; Wyburn, Kate; Johnson, David W.; McDonald, Stephen P.; Opdam, Helen; Chapman, Jeremy R.; Yang, Jean; Wong, Germaine
• Is Part Of: Transplantation. Volume 102:Issue 9(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; Transplantation immunology -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002144
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0041-1337

Abstract

Abstract : Background: To determine the incremental gains in graft and patient survival under a risk-based, deceased donor kidney allocation compared with the current Australian algorithm. Methods: Risk-based matching algorithms were applied to first graft, kidney only recipients (n = 7513) transplanted in Australia between 1994 and 2013. Probabilistic models were used to compare the waiting time, life, and QALYs and graft years between the 8 risk-based allocation strategies against current practice. Results: Compared with current practice, Kidney Donor Risk Index-Estimated Posttransplant Survival matching of the lowest 20% of scores reduced median waiting time by 0.64 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.73) for recipients aged 30 years or younger, but increased waiting time by 0.94 years (95% CI, 0.79-1.09) for recipients older than 60 years. Among all age groups, the greatest gains occurred if Kidney Donor Risk Index-Estimated Posttransplant Survival matching of the lowest 30% of scores was used, incurring a median overall gain of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.03-1.25) life years and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.30-1.26) graft years compared with the current practice. A median gain in survival of 1.91 years for younger recipients (aged 30-45 years) was offset by a median reduction in survival (by 0.95 life years) among the older recipients. Prioritization of lower-quality donor kidneys for older candidates reduced the waiting time for recipients older than 45 years, but no changes in graft and patient survivals were observed. Conclusions: Risk-based matching engendered a moderate, overall increase in graft and patient survivals, accrued through benefits for recipients 45 years or younger but disadvantage to recipients older than 60 years. Abstract : This simulation using Australian registry data underscores the challenges of deceased donor kidney allocation systems, showing that a new risk-based matching allocation algorithm would be associated with increased graft and patient survival, benefiting younger in detriment of older candidates. Supplemental digital content is available in the text.