Clinical outcome of elderly peritoneal dialysis patients with assisted care in a single medical centre: A 25 year experience. Issue 6 (27th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cheng, Chi‐Hung; Shu, Kuo‐Hsiung; Chuang, Ya‐Wen; Huang, Shih‐Ting; Chou, Ming‐Chih; Chang, Horng‐Rong
• Is Part Of: Nephrology. Volume 18:Issue 6(2013)
• Page Start: 468
• Page End: 473
• Publication Date: 2013-05-27
• Subjects: assisted care -- continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis -- elderly patients -- self‐care -- technique survival; Nephrology -- Periodicals; Kidneys -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Nephrologists -- Periodicals; 616.61; 616.61
• DOI: 10.1111/nep.12090
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1320-5358

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative treatment for elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). In Taiwan, non‐professional personnel are employed to provide assisted care for elderly patients. Whether assisted care is appropriate for elderly patients is unknown. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the outcomes of assisted care in a single centre. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study in a single medical centre. The outcomes were derived from the assessment of patient survival, technique survival and peritonitis incidence between self‐care patients and assisted‐care patients. Results: From 1984 to 2010, there were 138 elderly PD patients at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, of which 70% were assisted‐care patients and 30% self‐care patients. The mean duration of PD survival was 49.2 months in self‐care patients, which was significantly longer than the 17.0 months of assisted‐care patients ( P < 0.05). Using the multivariate Cox proportion regression model to adjust for risk factors, it was found that self‐care patients had a lower risk in both patient survival (Hazard Ratio 0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2–0.94, P < 0.05) and technique survival (Hazard ratio; 0.11, 95% CI 0.1–0.9, P < 0.05). Fluid overloading was the major cause of technique failure in assisted‐care patients. Type of assistance was not a risk factor for PD‐related peritonitis. Conclusion: Our elderly assisted care had patients had a poorer survival and technique survival rates than those of the self‐care patients. We argue that this is because early recognition of medical deterioration and early medical intervention are necessary for a better outcome for elderly PD patients. Summary at a Glance: This is a retrospective cohort study in a single medical centre in Taiwan. The authors try to compare the outcomes including patient survival, technique survival and peritonitis incidence between self‐care patients and assisted‐care patients. Their results showed that elderly patients with assisted care had a poorer patient survival and technique survival rate than those of the self‐care patients. They indicated that this is because early recognition of medical deterioration and early medical intervention are necessary for a better outcome for elderly PD patients and need more training for the person in the activity of patient care.