A risk‐based life cycle cost strategy for optimal design and evaluation of control methods for nonlinear structures. (27th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: El‐Khoury, Omar; Shafieezadeh, Abdollah; Fereshtehnejad, Ehsan
• Is Part Of: Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. Volume 47:Number 11(2018)
• Page Start: 2297
• Page End: 2314
• Publication Date: 2018-06-27
• Subjects: earthquakes -- hazard risk assessment -- life cycle–cost analysis -- optimal control algorithms -- optimization -- structural reliability; Structural dynamics -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; 624.1762
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3069
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0098-8847

Abstract

Summary: The lack of direct correspondence between control objectives and hazard risks over the lifetime of systems is a key shortcoming of current control techniques. This along with the inability to objectively analyze the benefits and costs of control solutions compared with conventional methods has hindered widespread application of control systems in seismic regions. To address these gaps, this paper offers 2 new contributions. First, it introduces risk‐based life cycle–cost (LCC) optimal control algorithms, where LCC is incorporated as the performance objective in the control design. Two strategies called risk‐based linear quadratic regulator and unconstrained risk‐based regulator are subsequently proposed. The considered costs include the initial cost of the structure and control system, LCC of maintenance, and probabilistically derived estimates of seismic‐induced repair costs and losses associated with downtime, injuries, and casualties throughout the life of the structure. This risk‐based framework accounts for uncertainties in both system properties and hazard excitations and uses outcrossing rate theory to estimate fragilities for various damage states. The second contribution of this work is a risk‐based probabilistic framework for LCC analysis of existing and proposed control strategies. The proposed control designs are applied to the nonlinear model of a 4‐story building subjected to seismic excitations. Results show that these control methods reduce the LCC of the structure significantly compared with the status quo option (benefits of up to $1 351 000). The advancements offered in this paper enhance the cost‐effectiveness of control systems and objectively showcase their benefits for risk‐informed decision making.