Analytical and empirical models for predicting the drift capacity of modern unreinforced masonry walls. (21st May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilding, Bastian Valentin; Beyer, Katrin
• Is Part Of: Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. Volume 47:Number 10(2018)
• Page Start: 2012
• Page End: 2031
• Publication Date: 2018-05-21
• Subjects: Critical Diagonal Crack (CDC) model -- flexure controlled -- shear controlled -- ultimate drift capacity -- unreinforced masonry walls; Structural dynamics -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; 624.1762
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0098-8847

Abstract

Summary: Displacement‐based seismic assessment of buildings containing unreinforced masonry (URM) walls requires as input, among others, estimates of the in‐plane drift capacity at the considered limit states. Current codes assess the drift capacity of URM walls by means of empirical models with most codes relating the drift capacity to the failure mode and wall slenderness. Comparisons with experimental results show that such relationships result in large scatter and usually do not provide satisfactory predictions. The objective of this paper is to determine trends in drift capacities of modern URM walls from 61 experimental tests and to investigate whether analytical models could lead to more reliable estimates of the displacement capacity than the currently used empirical models. A recently developed analytical model for the prediction of the ultimate drift capacity for both shear and flexure controlled URM walls is introduced and simplified into an equation that is suitable for code implementation. The approach follows the idea of plastic hinge models for reinforced concrete or steel structures. It explicitly considers the influence of crushing due to flexural or shear failure in URM walls and takes into account the effect of kinematic and static boundary conditions on the drift capacity. Finally, the performance of the analytical model is benchmarked against the test data and other empirical formulations. It shows that it yields significantly better estimates than empirical models in current codes. The paper concludes with an investigation of the sensitivity of the ultimate drift capacity to the wall geometry, static, and kinematic boundary conditions.