A framework for the case-specific assessment of Green Infrastructure in mitigating urban flood hazards. (October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schubert, Jochen E.; Burns, Matthew J.; Fletcher, Tim D.; Sanders, Brett F.
• Is Part Of: Advances in water resources. Volume 108(2017)
• Page Start: 55
• Page End: 68
• Publication Date: 2017-10
• Subjects: Green-Infrastructure -- Flood hazard mitigation -- Urban catchment -- Hydrologic modeling -- Hydraulic modeling; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrodynamics -- Periodicals; Hydraulic engineering -- Periodicals; 551.48
• DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.07.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0309-1708

Abstract

Highlights: The framework allows to quantify and map the benefits and limitations of Green Infrastructure for urban flood mitigation. In the LSC catchment, Green Infrastructure substantially reduces urban flood hazards from short duration storms. Green Infrastructure efficacy should be tested in terms of storm probability and duration. Abstract: This research outlines a framework for the case-specific assessment of Green Infrastructure (GI) performance in mitigating flood hazard in small urban catchments. The urban hydrologic modeling tool (MUSIC) is coupled with a fine resolution 2D hydrodynamic model (BreZo) to test to what extent retrofitting an urban watershed with GI, rainwater tanks and infiltration trenches in particular, can propagate flood management benefits downstream and support intuitive flood hazard maps useful for communicating and planning with communities. The hydrologic and hydraulic models are calibrated based on current catchment conditions, then modified to represent alternative GI scenarios including a complete lack of GI versus a full implementation of GI. Flow in the hydrologic/hydraulic models is forced using a range of synthetic rainfall events with annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs) between 1–63% and durations from 10 min to 24 h. Flood hazard benefits mapped by the framework include maximum flood depths and extents, flow intensity (m 2 /s), flood duration, and critical storm duration leading to maximum flood conditions. Application of the system to the Little Stringybark Creek (LSC) catchment shows that across the range of AEPs tested and for storm durations equal or less than 3 h, presently implemented GI reduces downstream flooded area on average by 29%, while a full implementation of GI would reduce downstream flooded area on average by 91%. A full implementation of GI could also lower maximum flow intensities by 83% on average, reducing the drowning hazard posed by urban streams and improving the potential for access by emergency responders. For storm durations longer than 3 h, a full implementation of GI lacks the capacity to retain the resulting rainfall depths and only reduces flooded area by 8% and flow intensity by 5.5%.