Comparison of the Lag Screw Placements for the Treatment of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures regarding Trabecular Bone Failure. (22nd November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Celik, Talip; Mutlu, Ibrahim; Ozkan, Arif; Kisioglu, Yasin
• Other Names: Zdero Radovan Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical engineering. Volume 2016(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-11-22
• Subjects: Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; Biomedical Engineering; Biomedical engineering; Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1155/2016/5470798
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2314-5129

Abstract

Abstract : Background. In this study, the cut-out risk of Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) was investigated in nine different positions of the lag screw for two fracture types by using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Methods. Two types of fractures (31-A1.1 and A2.1 in AO classification) were generated in the femur model obtained from Computerized Tomography images. The DHS model was placed into the fractured femur model in nine different positions. Tip-Apex Distances were measured using SolidWorks. In FEA, the force applied to the femoral head was determined according to the maximum value being observed during walking. Results. The highest volume percentage exceeding the yield strength of trabecular bone was obtained in posterior-inferior region in both fracture types. The best placement region for the lag screw was found in the middle of both fracture types. There are compatible results between Tip-Apex Distances and the cut-out risk except for posterior-superior and superior region of 31-A2.1 fracture type. Conclusion. The position of the lag screw affects the risk of cut-out significantly. Also, Tip-Apex Distance is a good predictor of the cut-out risk. All in all, we can supposedly say that the density distribution of the trabecular bone is a more efficient factor compared to the positions of lag screw in the cut-out risk.