Consensus on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the Aorta: A first consensus paper using a Delphi method. Issue 6 (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Borger van der Burg, B.L.S.; Kessel, B.; DuBose, J.J.; Hörer, T.M.; Hoencamp, R.
• Is Part Of: Injury. Volume 50:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 1186
• Page End: 1191
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: REBOA -- Delphi consensus -- Indications -- contra indications; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- surgery -- Periodicals; Lésions et blessures -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.024
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-1383

Abstract

Highlights: This is the first Delphi Consensus on the use of REBOA. Our panel reached consensus on (contra)indications, physiological parameters for patient selection and early femoral access. There was no consensus on the use of REBOA in the pre-hospital setting, patients in extremis and in patients with 2 or more major bleeding sites. Further research should focus on REBOA in pre hospital and military setting, patients in (near) cardiac arrest and inflation times. Abstract: Background: To further strengthen the evidence base on the use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) we performed a Delphi consensus. The aim of this paper is to establish consensus on the indications and contraindications for the use of REBOA in trauma and non-trauma patients based on the existing evidence and expertise. Study Design: A literature review facilitated the design of a three-round Delphi questionnaire. Delphi panelists were identified by the investigators. Consensus was reached when at least 70% of the panelists responded to the survey and more than 70% of respondents reached agreement or disagreement. Results: Panel members reached consensus on potential indications, contra-indications and settings for use of REBOA (excluding the pre hospital environment), physiological parameters for patient selection and indications for early femoral access. Panel members failed to reach consensus on the use of REBOA in patients in extremis (no pulse, no blood pressure) and the use of REBOA in patients with two major bleeding sites. Conclusions: Consensus was reached on indications, contra indications, physiological parameters for patient selection for REBOA and early femoral access. The panel did not reach consensus on the use of REBOA in patients in pre-hospital settings, patients in extremis (no pulse, no blood pressure) and in patients with 2 or more major bleeding sites. Further research should focus on the indications of REBOA in pre hospital settings, patients in near cardiac arrest and REBOA inflation times.