Test-retest reliability of brain arousal regulation as assessed with VIGALL 2.0. Issue 1 (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Huang, Jue; Sander, Christian; Jawinski, Philippe; Ulke, Christine; Spada, Janek; Hegerl, Ulrich; Hensch, Tilman
• Is Part Of: Neuropsychiatric electrophysiology. Volume 1:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 13
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Test-retest reliability -- Brain arousal regulation -- EEG-vigilance stages -- VIGALL 2.0; Neuropsychiatry -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; Brain -- Electric properties -- Periodicals; 616.807547
• DOI: 10.1186/s40810-015-0013-9
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-4788

Abstract

Abstract Background Different levels of brain arousal can be delineated not only during sleep but also during wakefulness. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the gold standard to assess different levels of brain arousal. A novel EEG- and electrooculography (EOG)-based tool, the Vigilance Algorithm Leipzig (VIGALL 2.0), allows determining the level of EEG-vigilance (indicating brain arousal). Considering the frequency patterns and LORETA-based cortical distribution of electroencephalic activity, VIGALL 2.0 automatically attributes one out of seven vigilance stages to each EEG segment (1-sec EEG segments by default), ranging from high alertness (stage 0), to relaxed wakefulness (stage A1 to A3), to drowsiness (stage B1 to B2/3) up to sleep onset (stage C). Building on the time series of these seven vigilance stages across 20 min, two parameterizations of the temporal dynamic (brain arousal regulation) are calculated: the lability score and the slope index. Methods 27 healthy participants (age = 22.93 ± 3.44 years, 18 females) underwent two sessions (7 days apart) of a twenty-minute eyes-closed resting EEG paradigm. Results The test-retest reliability coefficients for the EEG-vigilance stages were between rho = .53 and .86 (all p < .01). For the temporal dynamic of the stages across 20 min, the test-retest reliability coefficients were rho = .70 (lability score, p < .001) and .71 (slope index, p < .001). Conclusions This study demonstrated some trait aspects of brain arousal regulation by confirming the stability of temporal dynamic of EEG-vigilance stages as assessed with VIGALL 2.0. Considering the "first day in lab" effect identified in the present study, more adaptation to the lab surrounding and a stricter control of other state factors should be taken into account, which might improve reliability. Additionally, in a clinical context, a broader range of brain arousal regulation patterns might be found, possibly leading to higher test-retest reliability than was found in this homogenous healthy sample. This would be desirable, as parameters of brain arousal regulation are promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for diseases with arousal disturbances, such as affective disorders, ADHD and fatigue.