The Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Automated Angiography in Type II Endoleaks Detection: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. (26th March 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Automated Angiography in Type II Endoleaks Detection: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. (26th March 2018)
- Main Title:
- The Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Automated Angiography in Type II Endoleaks Detection: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
- Authors:
- Mascoli, Chiara
Faggioli, Gianluca
Gallitto, Enrico
Vento, Vincenzo
Indelicato, Giuseppe
Pini, Rodolfo
Vacirca, Andrea
Stella, Andrea
Gargiulo, Mauro - Other Names:
- Andreassi Maria G. Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction . Iodinated contrast media completion angiography (ICM-A) may underestimate the presence of type II endoleak (ELII) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), particularly if they are at low flow. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been proposed as the gold standard in ELII detection during EVAR follow-up. Intraprocedural carbon dioxide (CO2 ) angiography has been shown to be useful in this setting; however no comparative studies including these three techniques are currently available. Our aim was to investigate the accuracy of a new automated CO2 angiographic (CO2 -A) system in the detection of ELII, by comparing it with ICM-A and CEUS. Methods . A series of consecutive patients undergoing EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were enrolled and submitted to ICM-A and CO2 -A during the procedure. The iodinated contrast media were delivered through an automatic injector connected to a pigtail catheter in the suprarenal aorta. CO2 was delivered through a recently available automatic injector connected to a 10 F sheath positioned in the external iliac artery. All patients were blindly evaluated by CEUS within postoperative day 1. The ICM-A and CO2 -A ability to detect ELII was compared with that of CEUS through Cohen's concordance Index( K ) . Results . Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study. One (5%), seven (33%), and four (19%) ELII were detected by ICM-A, CO2 -A, and CEUS, respectively. The only ELII detected by ICM-A was also detectedAbstract : Introduction . Iodinated contrast media completion angiography (ICM-A) may underestimate the presence of type II endoleak (ELII) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), particularly if they are at low flow. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been proposed as the gold standard in ELII detection during EVAR follow-up. Intraprocedural carbon dioxide (CO2 ) angiography has been shown to be useful in this setting; however no comparative studies including these three techniques are currently available. Our aim was to investigate the accuracy of a new automated CO2 angiographic (CO2 -A) system in the detection of ELII, by comparing it with ICM-A and CEUS. Methods . A series of consecutive patients undergoing EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were enrolled and submitted to ICM-A and CO2 -A during the procedure. The iodinated contrast media were delivered through an automatic injector connected to a pigtail catheter in the suprarenal aorta. CO2 was delivered through a recently available automatic injector connected to a 10 F sheath positioned in the external iliac artery. All patients were blindly evaluated by CEUS within postoperative day 1. The ICM-A and CO2 -A ability to detect ELII was compared with that of CEUS through Cohen's concordance Index( K ) . Results . Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study. One (5%), seven (33%), and four (19%) ELII were detected by ICM-A, CO2 -A, and CEUS, respectively. The only ELII detected by ICM-A was also detected by CO2 -A and CEUS. Three cases of ELII detected by CO2 -A were not detected by CEUS. All ELII detected by CEUS were visualized by CO2 -A. CEUS and ICM-A showed a poor agreement (Cohen'sK : 0.35) while CEUS and CO2 -A showed a substantial agreement (Cohen'sK : 0.65) for ELII detection. Conclusion . CO2 -A is safe and effective method for ELII detection in EVAR, with a significantly higher agreement with CEUS if compared with ICM-A. This trial is registered with 155/2015/U/Oss. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Contrast media & molecular imaging. Volume 2018(2018)
- Journal:
- Contrast media & molecular imaging
- Issue:
- Volume 2018(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2018, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 2018
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-2018-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2018-03-26
- Subjects:
- Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals
Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals
Contrast media (Diagnostic imaging) -- Periodicals
Contrast Media -- Periodicals
Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals
Substances de contraste -- Périodiques
Diagnostics moléculaires -- Périodiques
Imagerie médicale
Substance de contraste
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
616.0754 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15554317 ↗
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cmmi/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1155/2018/7647165 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1555-4309
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3426.351450
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10663.xml