Predator–prey interactions in a ladybeetle–aphid system depend on spatial scale. Issue 13 (11th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lin, Wei‐Ting; Pennings, Steven C.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 8:Issue 13(2018)
• Page Start: 6537
• Page End: 6546
• Publication Date: 2018-06-11
• Subjects: Aphids -- Coccinellids -- Cycloneda sanguinea -- Iva frutescens -- metacommunity -- scale‐dependent -- spatial scale -- species interaction -- Uroleucon ambrosiae; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4117
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: The outcome of species interactions may manifest differently at different spatial scales; therefore, our interpretation of observed interactions will depend on the scale at which observations are made. For example, in ladybeetle–aphid systems, the results from small‐scale cage experiments usually cannot be extrapolated to landscape‐scale field observations. To understand how ladybeetle–aphid interactions change across spatial scales, we evaluated predator–prey interactions in an experimental system. The experimental habitat consisted of 81 potted plants and was manipulated to facilitate analysis across four spatial scales. We also simulated a spatially explicit metacommunity model parallel to the experiment. In the experiment, we found that the negative effect of ladybeetles on aphids decreased with increasing spatial scales. This pattern can be explained by ladybeetles strongly suppressing aphids at small scales, but not colonizing distant patches fast enough to suppress aphids at larger scales. In the experiment, the positive effects of aphids on ladybeetles were strongest at three‐plant scale. In a model scenario where predators did not have demographic dynamics, we found, consistent with the experiment, that both the effects of ladybeetles on aphids and the effects of aphids on ladybeetles decreased with increasing spatial scales. These patterns suggest that dispersal was the primary cause of ladybeetle population dynamics in our experiment: aphids increased ladybeetle numbers at smaller scales because ladybeetles stayed in a patch longer and performed area‐restricted searches after encountering aphids; these behaviors did not affect ladybeetle numbers at larger spatial scales. The parallel experimental and model results illustrate how predator–prey interactions can change across spatial scales, suggesting that our interpretation of observed predator–prey dynamics would differ if observations were made at different scales. This study demonstrates how studying ecological interactions at a range of scales can help link the results of small‐scale ecological experiments to landscape‐scale ecological problems. Abstract : We studied how interactions between ladybeetles and aphids vary with spatial scale, using field population data, a field experiment, and a spatially explicit model. We found that both top‐down and bottom‐up effects were more striking at smaller scales, suggesting that observed predator–prey dynamics can be scale dependent.