International Aid as Modern Imperialism—What Does Cross-Cultural Psychology Really Have to Offer? A Commentary on "The Positive Role of Culture: What Cross-Cultural Psychology Has to Offer to Developmental Aid Effectiveness Research, by Symen A. Brouwers". (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ashdown, Brien K.; Buck, Marilyn
• Is Part Of: Journal of cross-cultural psychology. Volume 49:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: 545
• Page End: 553
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: international aid -- indigenous psychologies -- NGOs -- Guatemala; Ethnopsychology -- Periodicals; 155.805
• DOI: 10.1177/0022022118768428
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0221

Abstract

In his article, Brouwers argues that cross-cultural psychologists (CCPs; a term he uses to include cultural psychologists and indigenous psychologists) should be a resource for agencies and organizations that engage in international and developmental aid. His argument is that CCPs can help these agencies and organizations ensure that their interventions become "entrenched"—meaning they become long-lasting aspects of life in the communities receiving the aid. We agree with Brouwers that CCPs can and should be more involved with international aid organizations. However, we argue that CCPs' primary concern should be ensuring the ethical and cultural appropriateness of the ways in which the aid organizations interact with recipient communities. We believe this can only happen when indigenous psychologists are involved in the intervention in ways that ensure recipient communities are fully engaged with any aid-based intervention. We highlight our argument by utilizing some preliminary analyses from a related project we recently completed in Guatemala.