Dissipation and residues of trifloxystrobin and its metabolite in rice under field conditions. (26th September 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Puyu; Wang, Lin; Hao, Xianghong; Han, Lijun
• Is Part Of: Environmental toxicology and chemistry. Volume 33:Number 12(2014:Dec.)
• Page Start: 2654
• Page End: 2660
• Publication Date: 2014-09-26
• Subjects: Trifloxystrobin -- CGA 321113 -- Rice -- Dissipation -- Residue; Pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental chemistry -- Periodicals; 615.902
• DOI: 10.1002/etc.2731
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0730-7268

Abstract

Abstract: Residue analysis of trifloxystrobin and its metabolite (CGA 321113) in rice matrices, paddy water, and soil was developed using the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method and high‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The method was used to evaluate the dissipation rate of trifloxystrobin and CGA 321113 in rice seedling, soil, and paddy water as well as the residual level in harvest rice (grain, hull, straw) and soil. The results demonstrated that the dissipation half‐lives of trifloxystrobin in rice seedling, soil, and water were 1.9 d to 4.7 d, 0.35 d to 0.54 d, and 0.28 d to 0.51 d, respectively. The final total residue of trifloxystrobin and CGA 321113 was highest in rice hull and lowest in paddy soil. The highest total residues in husked rice, rice hull, straw, and paddy soil at 28 d after spraying were 0.39 mg kg −1, 3.82 mg kg −1, 0.29 mg kg −1, and 0.15 mg kg −1, respectively. According to the final residue data and the maximum residue limits of trifloxystrobin in rice grain and straw (Codex Alimentarius) and in rice hull (US Environmental Protection Agency), 28 d could be recommended as the preharvest interval for trifloxystrobin application in the rice field. The data show that CGA 321113 constitutes a small amount of the final total residues in rice matrices, whereas it is much higher than its parent compound in soil samples. Environ Toxicol Chem 2014;33:2654–2660 . © 2014 SETAC