A 20‐year historical prospective cohort study of root canal treatments. A Multilevel analysis. (7th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prati, C.; Pirani, C.; Zamparini, F.; Gatto, M. R.; Gandolfi, M. G.
• Is Part Of: International endontic journal. Volume 51:Number 9(2018)
• Page Start: 955
• Page End: 968
• Publication Date: 2018-03-07
• Subjects: long‐term cohort study -- periapical lesion -- root canal treatment; Endodontics -- Periodicals; 617.6342
• DOI: 10.1111/iej.12908
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-2885

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To evaluate the number of healthy and functional root filled teeth of patients included in a recall programme for at least 20 years. Methodology: Teeth were root filled by a single specialist following manual canal instrumentation, lateral/vertical compaction of gutta‐percha and restored with glass–ionomer cements and bonding system/composite resin. In a large percentage of teeth, a metal‐ceramic crown was placed during follow‐up. Patients included in the recall programme ( n = 130) were blindly assessed both clinically and radiographically (every 2 years) to evaluate clinical symptoms and periapical status (PAI). The following variables were analysed: age, tooth location, tooth type, initial diagnosis, PAI, root filling length and coronal restoration type. Chi‐square test and multilevel analysis were performed to detect variables associated with treatment functionality and disease/lesions ( P < 0.05). A cumulative teeth survival curve was constructed by means of Kaplan–Meier using extractions as the end‐point. Results: At the 20‐year recall, 72 patients (31 M, 41 F; mean age 57.7 ± 8.29 years; 196 teeth) completed the follow‐up. Thirty‐six patients were excluded for medical complications or died before the end of the study. Drop‐outs consisted of 22 patients (17%) who did not complete the follow‐up. Single metal‐ceramic crowns were positioned after 4–6 months in 40% of teeth. Composite restorations were replaced with single metal‐ceramic crowns during the follow‐up in 53% of teeth after 8–19 years. Of 196 teeth, 155 were classified as Survived (79%), 128 of which (65%) were Healthy (PAI ≤ 2). Thirty‐nine teeth (20%) were extracted for nonendodontic reasons. Twenty‐nine teeth (15%) were classified as: re‐exacerbation (11 teeth; 5.6%) or persistent asymptomatic lesions (18 teeth; 9%). Only two re‐exacerbated teeth were extracted. Multilevel analysis confirmed the clinical relevance of tooth type ( P = 0.001) on Survived and healthy teeth ( P = 0.007). Tooth location ( P = 0.0045) and initial diagnosis ( P = 0.019) significantly affected only Healthy teeth. Conclusions: Root filled teeth were more frequently extracted for non‐endodontic reasons rather than for endodontic disease. The majority of teeth with adequate root fillings, adequate restorations and included in a recall programme remained functional and healthy for more than 20 years.