Contemporary evolution and scaling of 32 major cities in China. Issue 6 (5th July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhao, Shuqing; Liu, Shuguang; Xu, Chunxue; Yuan, Wenping; Sun, Yan; Yan, Wende; Zhao, Meifang; Henebry, Geoffrey M.; Fang, Jingyun
• Is Part Of: Ecological applications. Volume 28:Issue 6(2018)
• Page Start: 1655
• Page End: 1668
• Publication Date: 2018-07-05
• Subjects: evolution of cities -- horizontal scaling -- power scaling -- scaling laws -- temporal scaling -- urban attributes -- urban ecosystems -- urban sustainability; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Biology, Economic -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/eap.1760
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1051-0761

Abstract

Abstract: Most of the planet's population currently lives in urban areas, and urban land expansion is one of the most dramatic forms of land conversion. Understanding how cities evolve temporally, spatially, and organizationally in a rapidly urbanizing world is critical for sustainable development. However, few studies have examined the coevolution of urban attributes in time and space simultaneously and the adequacy of power law scaling across cities and through time, particularly in countries that have experienced abrupt, widespread, political and economic changes. Here, we show the temporal coevolution of multiple physical, demographic, socioeconomic, and environmental attributes in individual cities, and the cross‐city scaling of urban attributes at six time points (i.e., 1978, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010) in 32 major Chinese cities. We found that power law scaling could adequately characterize both the cross‐city scaling of urban attributes across cities and the longitudinal scaling describing the temporal coevolution of urban attributes within individual cities. The cross‐city scaling properties demonstrated substantial changes over time signifying evolved social and economic forces. A key finding was that the cross‐city linear or superlinear scaling of urban area with population contradicts the theoretical sublinear power law scaling proposed between infrastructure and population. Furthermore, the cross‐city scaling between area and population transitioned from linear to superlinear over time, and the superlinear scaling in recent times suggests decreased infrastructure efficiency. Our results demonstrate a diseconomy of scale in urban areal expansion that indicates a significant waste of land resources in the urbanization process. Future planning efforts should focus on policies that increase urban land use efficiency before continuing expansion.