A multidimensional approach to understanding floral function and form1. Issue 6 (1st June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carr, David E.
• Is Part Of: American journal of botany. Volume 100:Issue 6(2013)
• Page Start: 1102
• Page End: 1104
• Publication Date: 2013-06-01
• Subjects: andromonoecy -- dioecy -- ecological interactions -- gynodioecy -- inbreeding -- mating‐system -- self‐incompatibility; Botany -- Periodicals; Botany; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 580
• DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1300049
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-9122

Abstract

Abstract : Premise of the study: Variation in plant mating systems is a fundamental component of the diversity of floral form and function. Mating systems have a strong influence on the distribution and expression of genetic variation, which in turn can influence the course of mating system evolution. It has long been appreciated, however, that ecological interactions may provide much of the impetus behind these evolutionary changes. Methods: This commentary reviews the Special Section in the American Journal of Botany (vol. 100, issue 6) that features novel research on the role of interactions between plants and their pollinators, seed dispersers, herbivores, and interspecific competitors in the evolution of selfing rates and gender. These studies vary in approach from empirical experiments, to phylogenetic comparisons, to theoretical models, to literature reviews as they each attempt to shed new light on longstanding questions about the selective forces and evolutionary pathways that have led to the diversified means by which plants promote or discourage self‐fertilization. Key results: Evidence is provided that indicates that ecological interactions (e.g., herbivory and heterospecific pollen deposition by pollinators) can strongly influence the relative advantages of selfing and outcrossing. Ecological interactions can also influence allocation to sexual functions, which will influence individual and population outcrossing rates and possibly the evolutionary path of gender expression. Conclusions: Mating systems evolution is clearly a multidimensional problem. Research that places the study of mating and sexual systems within a more realistic ecological context will no doubt reveal more complexity as we move toward a better understanding of plant diversity.