Combined comparative molecular field analysis, comparative molecular similarity indices analysis, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies of histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors. (14th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sharma, Monika; Jha, Prakash; Verma, Priyanka; Chopra, Madhu
• Is Part Of: Chemical biology & drug design. Volume 93:Number 5(2019)
• Page Start: 910
• Page End: 925
• Publication Date: 2019-02-14
• Subjects: CoMFA -- CoMSIA -- HDAC6 inhibitors -- molecular docking -- molecular dynamics; Drugs -- Design -- Periodicals; Pharmaceutical chemistry -- Periodicals; Biochemistry -- Periodicals; 615.19005
• DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13488
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-0277

Abstract

Abstract: Human histone deacetylase isoform 6 (HDAC6) has been shown to have an immense role in cell motility and aggresome formation and is being an attractive selective target for the treatment of multiple tumour types and neurodegenerative conditions. The discovery of selective HDAC6 inhibitors with new chemical functionalities is therefore of utmost interest to researchers. In order to examine the structural requirements for HDAC6‐specific inhibitors and to derive predictive model which can be used for designing new selective HDAC6 inhibitors, a three‐dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship study was carried out on a diverse set of ligands using common feature‐based pharmacophore alignment followed by employing comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) techniques. The models displayed high correlation of 0.978 and 0.991 for best CoMFA and CoMSIA models, respectively, and a good statistical significance. The model could be used for predicting activities of the test set compounds as well as for deriving useful information regarding steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic properties of the molecules used in this study. Further, the training and test set molecules were docked into the HDAC6 binding site and molecular dynamics was carried out to suggest structural requirements for design of new inhibitors. Abstract : In this paper, we are reporting a three‐dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship study comprising comparative molecular field analysis and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis performed on a diverse set of HDAC6‐specific ligands from literature using common feature‐based pharmacophore alignment followed by molecular docking and dynamics techniques.