Less is more? Effects of exhaustive vs. minimal emotion labelling on emotion regulation strategy planning. Issue 4 (19th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vine, Vera; Bernstein, Emily E.; Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
• Is Part Of: Cognition and emotion. Volume 33:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 855
• Page End: 862
• Publication Date: 2019-05-19
• Subjects: Emotion -- emotion regulation -- affect labelling -- emotion labelling -- emotional clarity; Cognition -- Periodicals; Emotions and cognition -- Periodicals; 155.413
• DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1486286
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9931

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Previous research suggests that labelling emotions, or describing affective states using emotion words, facilitates emotion regulation. But how much labelling promotes emotion regulation? And which emotion regulation strategies does emotion labelling promote? Drawing on cognitive theories of emotion, we predicted that labelling emotions using fewer words would be less confusing and would facilitate forms of emotion regulation requiring more cognitively demanding processing of context. Participants ( N = 82) mentally immersed themselves in an emotional vignette, were randomly assigned to an exhaustive or minimal emotion labelling manipulation, and then completed an emotion regulation strategy planning task. Minimal (vs. exhaustive) emotion labelling promoted higher subjective emotional clarity. Furthermore, in terms of specific emotion regulation strategies, minimal emotion labelling prompted more plans for problem solving and marginally more plans for reappraisal, but did not affect plans for behavioural activation or social support seeking. We discuss implications for the cognitive mechanisms supporting the generation of emotion regulation strategies.