Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images. (3rd June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ho, Meng-Yin; Tseng, Wei-Lung; Xiao, Furen
• Other Names: Wei Guowei Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: International journal of biomedical imaging. Volume 2018(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-06-03
• Subjects: Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in medicine -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic; Imagerie médicale; Diagnostic imaging; Imaging systems in medicine; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.0754
• DOI: 10.1155/2018/5237693
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1687-4188

Abstract

Abstract : Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical procedure performed to relieve the intracranial pressure engendered by brain swelling. However, no easy and accurate method exists for determining the craniectomy surface area. In this study, we implemented and compared three methods of estimating the craniectomy surface area for evaluating the decompressive effort. We collected 118 sets of preoperative and postoperative brain computed tomography images from patients who underwent craniectomy procedures between April 2009 and April 2011. The surface area associated with each craniectomy was estimated using the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. The surface area was also estimated using a simple AC method, in which the area is calculated by multiplying the craniectomy length ( A ) by its height ( C ). The estimated surface area ranged from 9.46 to 205.32 cm 2, with a median of 134.80 cm 2 . The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) between the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods was 7.53 cm 2 . Furthermore, the RMSD was 14.45 cm 2 between the marching cube and AC methods and 12.70 cm 2 between the quasi-Monte Carlo and AC methods. Pairedt -tests indicated no statistically significant difference between these methods. The marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods yield similar results. The results calculated using the AC method are also clinically acceptable for estimating the DC surface area. Our results can facilitate additional studies on the association of decompressive effort with the effect of craniectomy.