Large-scale tests to assess the efficiency of a geosynthetic reinforcement over a cavity. Issue 2 (19th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tano, B. F. G.; Stoltz, G.; Coulibaly, S. S.; Bruhier, J.; Dias, D.; Olivier, F.; Touze-Foltz, N.
• Is Part Of: Geosynthetics international. Volume 25:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 242
• Page End: 258
• Publication Date: 2018-03-19
• Subjects: Geosynthetics -- Reinforcement -- Cavity -- Strain gauge -- Total pressure cell -- Large-scale test; Geosynthetics -- Periodicals; Geosynthetics; Periodicals; 624.1892
• DOI: 10.1680/jgein.18.00005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1072-6349

Abstract

Abstract : This report presents a new large-scale test apparatus (LSTA) developed to assess the efficiency of a geosynthetic reinforcement for the limitation of deformations of a geosynthetic lining system (GLS) over a 0.5 m wide cavity. Two experiments were conducted. The first one involved a geosynthetic clay liner, a nonwoven needle-punched geotextile and a high-density polyethylene geomembrane. For the second experiment, a 50 kN/m polyvinyl alcohol geogrid was imbedded within the sand layer below the geosynthetic clay liner to provide reinforcement above the cavity. An overburden pressure varying from 10 to 100 kPa was applied to the top of the GLS. Strain gauges were used to measure the strain within the geogrid and the geomembrane. The results proved that the 50 kN/m geogrid reinforcement beneath the geomembrane reduced the maximum strain within the geomembrane, compared to the case where the geomembrane was unreinforced, by 25% on average. The results showed that the overall strain within the geomembrane was 31% to 42% less than that of the geogrid above the cavity. Finally, the results showed that the spatial distribution of the strain within the geomembrane and that of the geogrid differed because of a conical shape of the collapsed zone.