Rationality, Expected Utility Theory and the Precautionary Principle. Issue 1 (2nd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Christiansen, Andreas
• Is Part Of: Ethics, policy & environment. Volume 22:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 3
• Page End: 20
• Publication Date: 2019-01-02
• Subjects: Environmental ethics -- Periodicals; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; 179.1
• DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2019.1581413
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2155-0085

Abstract

ABSTRACT: A common objection to the precautionary principle is that it is irrational. I argue that this objection goes beyond the often-discussed claim that the principle is incoherent. Instead, I argue, expected utility theory is the source of several more sophisticated irrationality charges against the precautionary principle. I then defend the principle from these objections by arguing (i) that the relevant features of the precautionary principle are part of plausible normative theories, and (ii) that the precautionary principle does not diverge more from ideal expected utility maximization than non-ideal expected utility maximizing procedures, and may do better in real-world choices.